The Innocence Project was founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck and Peter J. Neufeld at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University to assist prisoners who could be proven innocent through DNA testing.
Der Deutsche Richterbund (DRB) wählt weltweit herausragende Persönlichkeiten aus, die sich für Menschenrechte und Rechtsstaatlichkeit einsetzen. Damit will der Verband einen Beitrag leisten, um die allgemeinen Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten zu schützen und zu stärken.
Das Gedenkstättenportal der Landeszentrale für politische Bildung bietet umfangreiche Informationen über die Gedenkstättenarbeit im Land und viele Hinweise und Informationen zu den einzelnen Gedenkstätten.
Demand Progress is a national grassroots group with two million affiliated activists who fight for basic rights and freedoms needed for a modern democracy.
Staff Blog: Dr Cornelia Gräbner is a Lecturer in Hispanic Studies and Comparative Literature in the Department of Languages and Cultures at Lancaster University.
Um diese Rechte Realität werden zu lassen, unterstützt just human
Menschen in aller Welt, die von Krieg, Gewalt, politischer oder persönlicher
Verfolgung, Ausbeutung, strukturellen Fluchtursachen oder wirtschaftlicher
Not betroffen sind.
Religion & Human Rights provides a unique academic forum for the discussion of issues which are of crucial importance and which have global reach. The Journal covers the interactions, conflicts and reconciliations between religions or beliefs on the one hand; and systems for the promotion and protection of human rights, international, regional and national, on the other.
Interdisziplinäre Ansätze auf das internationale Recht | Recht der internationalen Organisationen | Internationale Gerichte | Menschenrechtsschutz | Investitionsschutzrecht | Politische Theorie
The Harvard Human Rights Journal (HHRJ) was founded in 1988 and has since endeavored to be a site for a broad spectrum of scholarship on international and domestic human rights issues.
K. Kinzelbach. Routledge research in human rights ; 7 Routledge, London u.a., (2015)Includes bibliographical references and indexIMD-Felder maschinell generiert (GBV); "The European Union uses a confidential, institutionalized Dialogue to raise human rights concerns with China, but little is publicly known about its set-up, its substance, its development over time and its impact. This book provides the first detailed reconstruction and assessment of the EU's responses to human rights violations in China from 1995 to the present day. Using classified documents in the EU's historical archives and interviews with diplomats, officials and human rights experts in Europe, China and the United States, Kinzelbach lifts the veil of secrecy on the EU-China Human Rights Dialogue and provides a rare insight into how the European Union and China conduct quiet diplomacy on human rights. The book reconstructs the evolution of the Dialogue and the EU's internal debate on the merits of quiet diplomacy, and draws comparisons with the approach of other actors, notably that of the United States. In doing so, the EU's relative impact is concluded to be tenuous if not counter-productive. The book also chronicles and analyses numerous human rights concerns that were raised in the period, ranging from structural issues to individual cases. This ground-breaking, in-depth case study will be of interest to students and scholars of international politics, human rights, international law, EU politics, especially the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy, and Chinese politics"--"The European Union uses a confidential, institutionalized Dialogue to raise human rights concerns with China, but little is publicly known about its set-up, its substance, its development over time and its impact. This book provides the first detailed reconstruction and assessment of the EU's responses to human rights violations in China from 1995 to the present day. Using classified documents in the EU's historical archives and interviews with diplomats, officials and human rights experts in Europe, China and the United States, Kinzelbach lifts the veil of secrecy on the EU-China Human Rights Dialogue and provides a rare insight into how the European Union and China conduct quiet diplomacy on human rights. The book reconstructs the evolution of the Dialogue and the EU's internal debate on the merits of quiet diplomacy, and draws comparisons with the approach of other actors, notably that of the United States. In doing so, the EU's relative impact is concluded to be tenuous if not counter-productive. The book also chronicles and analyses numerous human rights concerns that were raised in the period, ranging from structural issues to individual cases. This ground-breaking, in-depth case study will be of interest to students and scholars of international politics, human rights, international law, EU politics, especially the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy, and Chinese politics"--.
A. Mihr. Forschungen zur DDR-Gesellschaft Ch. Links Verlag, Berlin, 1. Aufl. edition, (2002)Zugl.: Berlin, Freie Univ., Diss., 2001aa; Der Einsatz für Menschenrechte im Visier der Stasi.