Publications

Anton Boudreau Ninkov, Chantal Ripp, Kathleen Gregory, Isabella Peters, and Stefanie Haustein. A dataset from a survey investigating disciplinary differences in data citation. Zenodo, 2023. [PUMA: citations forschungsdaten] URL

Wolmar Nyberg Åkerström, Kurt Baumann, Oscar Corcho, Romain David, Yann Le Franc, Bénédicte Madon, Barbara Magagna, András Micsik, Marco Molinaro, Milan Ojsteršek, Silvio Peroni, Andrea Scharnhorst, Lars Vogt, and Heinrich Widmann. DRAFT: Developing and implementing the semantic interoperability recommendations of the EOSC Interoperability Framework. EOSC Semantic Interoperability Task Force, 2024. [PUMA: eosc forschungsdaten interoperability semanticWeb standard] URL

Antony Della Vecchia, Michael Joswig, and Benjamin Lorenz. A FAIR File Format for Mathematical Software. 2023. [PUMA: fileformat forschungsdaten mardi mathematics]

Robert Sanderson, Mark Phillips, and Herbert Van de Sompel. Analyzing the Persistence of Referenced Web Resources with Memento. In arXiv (Eds.), 2011. [PUMA: forschungsdaten motivation persistentIdentifier]

Josh Brown, Phill Jones, Alice Meadows, and Fiona Murphy. The PID-optimised Research Lifecycle. Zenodo, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten persistentIdentifier] URL

Maggie Hellström, André Heughebaert, Rachael Kotarski, Paolo Manghi, Brian Matthews, Raphael Ritz, Anders Sparre Conrad, Tobias Weigel, Peter Wittenburg, and Mario Valle. Second draft Persistent Identifier (PID) policy for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). Zenodo, 2020. [PUMA: eosc forschungsdaten persistentIdentifier policy] URL

Lisa Käde. Kreative Maschinen und Urheberrecht. Datenrecht und neue Technologien, (2)Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten ki rechtlicheFragestellungen urheberrecht] URL

Michael Selzer. Kadi4Mat - Karlsruhe Data Infrastructure for Materials Science. Zenodo, 2023. [PUMA: eln forschungsdaten software tools] URL

Michael Felderer, Michael Goedicke, Lars Grunske, Wilhelm Hasselbring, Anna-Lena Lamprecht, and Bernhard Rumpe. Toward Research Software Engineering Research. Zenodo, 2023. [PUMA: classification forschungsdaten metadata software] URL

Paul Baumann. Rechte an Forschungsdaten. Trier University, 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten gwp rechtlicheFragestellungen urheberrecht] URL

Jianpei Geng, Tetyana Shalomayeva, Mariia Gryzlova, Amlan Mukherjee, Santo Santonocito, Dzhavid Dzhavadzade, Durga Dasari, Hiromitsu Kato, Rainer Stöhr, Andrej Denisenko, Norikazu Mizuochi, and Jörg Wrachtrup. Dopant-assisted stabilization of negatively charged single nitrogen-vacancy centers in phosphorus-doped diamond at low temperatures. 2023. [PUMA: darus]

Ilkay Melek Yazıcı. DATA PROVENANCE VISUALIZATION METHODOLOGIES. 2023. [PUMA: metadata provenance visualization]

Andreas Schreiber, and Regina Struminski. Tracing personal data using comics. Universal Access in Human--Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches and Methods: 11th International Conference, UAHCI 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9--14, 2017, Proceedings, Part I 11, 444--455, 2017. [PUMA: comics forschungsdaten metadata provenance]

Stefan Bieliauskas, and Andreas Schreiber. DLR-SC/prov-comics: QS PROV Comics Prototype - Big fixes. Zenodo, April 2017. [PUMA: comics forschungsdaten javascript metadata provenance software tools] URL

Till Kreutzer, and Georg Fischer. Urheberrecht in der Wissenschaft. Ein Überblick für Forschung, Lehre und Bibliotheken. Zenodo, August 2023. [PUMA: Urheberrecht forschungsdaten rechtlicheFragestellungen] URL

Ralf Depping. Rechtliche Aspekte des Forschungsdatenmanagements - Eine Einführung. 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten rechtlicheFragestellungen]

Benedikt Heinrichs, and Marius Politze. Moving towards a General Metadata Extraction Solution for Research Data with State-of-the-Art Methods.. KDIR, 227--234, 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten harvesting metadata similarity tools]

Paul N Edwards, Steven J Jackson, Geoffrey C Bowker, and Cory Philip Knobel. Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design. 2007. [PUMA: infrastructure it]

Semantic Web. In Tassilo Pellegrini, and Andreas Blumauer (Eds.), Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. [PUMA: metadata semanticWeb] URL

Birte Glimm, Ian Horrocks, Boris Motik, Giorgos Stoilos, and Zhe Wang. HermiT: An OWL 2 Reasoner. Journal of Automated Reasoning, (53)3:245--269, Oct 1, 2014. [PUMA: hermit metadata reasoning semanticWeb] URL

Lamy Jean-Baptiste. Automatic reasoning. Ontologies with Python: Programming OWL 2.0 Ontologies with Python and Owlready2, 157--185, Apress, Berkeley, CA, 2021. [PUMA: hermit metadata python reasoning semanticWeb] URL

Jan Martin Keil, and Sirko Schindler. Comparison and Evaluation of Ontologies for Units of Measurement. 2018. [PUMA: comparison metadata ontologie units]

Shilpa Verma, Rajesh Bhatia, Sandeep Harit, and Sanjay Batish. Scholarly knowledge graphs through structuring scholarly communication: a review. Complex & Intelligent Systems, (9)1:1059--1095, Feb 1, 2023. [PUMA: knowledgegraph metadata publications semanticWeb] URL

Morane Gruenpeter, Sabrina Granger, Alain Monteil, Neil Chue Hong, Elena Breitmoser, Mario Antonioletti, Daniel Garijo, Esteban González Guardia, Alejandra Gonzalez Beltran, Carole Goble, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Nick Juty, and Gabriela Mejias. D4.4 - Guidelines for recommended metadata standard for research software within EOSC. Zenodo, June 2023. [PUMA: eosc forschungsdaten metadata software standards] URL

Sheeba Samuel, and Daniel Mietchen. Computational reproducibility of Jupyter notebooks from biomedical publications. 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten jupyter reproducibility review software]

Carlos Martinez-Ortiz, Paula Martinez Lavanchy, Laurents Sesink, Brett G. Olivier, James Meakin, Maaike de Jong, and Maria Cruz. Practical guide to Software Management Plans. Zenodo, October 2022. [PUMA: datenmänagementplan dmp forschungsdaten software] URL

Paul Groth, Elena Simperl, Marieke van Erp, and Denny Vrandečić. Knowledge Graphs and their Role in the Knowledge Engineering of the 21st Century (Dagstuhl Seminar 22372). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten knowledgegraph metadata] URL

Robert L Grossman. Data Lakes, Clouds, and Commons: A Review of Platforms for Analyzing and Sharing Genomic Data. Trends in genetics : TIG, (35)3:223--234, England, March 2019. [PUMA: definition forschungsdaten tools] URL

Morane Gruenpeter, Daniel S. Katz, Anna-Lena Lamprecht, Tom Honeyman, Daniel Garijo, Alexander Struck, Anna Niehues, Paula Andrea Martinez, Leyla Jael Castro, Tovo Rabemanantsoa, Neil P. Chue Hong, Carlos Martinez-Ortiz, Laurents Sesink, Matthias Liffers, Anne Claire Fouilloux, Chris Erdmann, Silvio Peroni, Paula Martinez Lavanchy, Ilian Todorov, and Manodeep Sinha. Defining Research Software: a controversial discussion. Zenodo, 2021. [PUMA: definition forschungsdaten software] URL

Iratxe Puebla, Daniella Lowenberg, and FORCE11 Research Data Publishing Ethics WG. Joint FORCE11 & COPE Research Data Publishing Ethics Working Group Recommendations. Zenodo, 2021. [PUMA: autorenschaft ethischeFragestellungen forschungsdaten repositorien] URL

Katarzyna Biernacka. LEGO® Metadaten für die Reproduzierbarkeit. Zenodo, 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata schulung spiel] URL

Paul Richmond, Dawn Walker, Simon Coakley, and Daniela Romano. High performance cellular level agent-based simulation with FLAME for the GPU. Briefings in bioinformatics, (11)3:334--347, Oxford Univ Press, 2010. [PUMA: simulations tools]

Matthias Ruf, and Holger Steeb. An open, modular, and flexible micro X-ray computed tomography system for research. Review of Scientific Instruments, (91)11:113102, 2020. [PUMA: relatedpublication sfb1313 tools x-ray] URL

Forschungsdatenmanagement in kleinen Forschungsprojekten - Eine Handreichung für die Praxis.. In RatSWD (Rat für Sozial-und Wirtschaftsdaten) (Eds.), RatSWD Output Series, (7. Berufungsperiode)32023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten handreichung positionspapier sozialwissenschaften verhaltenswissenschaften wirtschaftswissenschaften]

Föderierte Dateninfrastrukturen für die wissenschaftliche Nutzung. NFDI, EOSC und Gaia-X: Vergleich und Anregungen für eine engagierte Mitgestaltung des Ausbaus und der Weiterentwicklung. In RfII – Rat für Informationsinfrastrukturen (Eds.), 4March 2023. [PUMA: eosc forschungsdaten gaiaX nfdi politik] URL

European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, and Innovation. Scholarly infrastructures for research software : report from the EOSC Executive Board Working Group (WG) Architecture Task Force (TF) SIRS. Publications Office, 2020. [PUMA: eosc forschungsdaten infrastruktur software]

Roberto Di Cosmo, Morane Gruenpeter, Bruno Marmol, Alain Monteil, Laurent Romary, and Jozefina Sadowska. Curated Archiving of Research Software Artifacts: Lessons Learned from the French Open Archive (HAL). International Journal of Digital Curation, (15)1:16, Edinburgh University Library, August 2020. [PUMA: curation forschungsdaten quality repository software] URL

Susanne Arndt, Benjamin Farnbacher, Marc Fuhrmans, Stephan Hachinger, Johanna Hickmann, Nils Hoppe, Martin Thomas Horsch, Dorothea Iglezakis, Ashish Karmacharya, Giacomo Lanza, Sophia Leimer, Johannes Munke, Džulia Terzijska, Johannes Theissen-Lipp, Cord Wiljes, and Jürgen Windeck. Metadata4Ing: An ontology for describing the generation of research data within a scientific activity.. In Zenodo (Eds.), Zenodo, February 2022. [PUMA: engineering forschungsdaten metadata myown ontologie] URL

Matthew Buys. DataCite Looking Ahead – Global Data Citation Corpus for All Data Citations. Zenodo, 2023. [PUMA: citations forschungsdaten metadata] URL

Philipp Cimiano, Christian Pietsch, and Cord Wiljes. Studies in Analytical Reproducibility: the Conquaire Project. 8057464 bytes, 2021. [PUMA: analyticalreproducibility forschungsdaten psychology reproducibility software] URL

Timo Koch, Dennis Gläser, Anett Seeland, Sarbani Roy, Katharina Schulze, Kilian Weishaupt, David Boehringer, Sibylle Hermann, and Bernd Flemisch. A sustainable infrastructure concept for improved accessibility, reusability, and archival of research software. 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten repository software tools]

Stephan Druskat, Oliver Bertuch, Guido Juckeland, Oliver Knodel, and Tobias Schlauch. Software publications with rich metadata: state of the art, automated workflows and HERMES concept. 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata project software]

Neil P. Chue Hong, Daniel S. Katz, Michelle Barker, Anna-Lena Lamprecht, Carlos Martinez, Fotis E. Psomopoulos, Jen Harrow, Leyla Jael Castro, Morane Gruenpeter, Paula Andrea Martinez, and Tom Honeyman. FAIR Principles for Research Software (FAIR4RS Principles). Research Data Alliance, 2021. [PUMA: fairPrinciples forschungsdaten software] URL

Bernd Flemisch, Sibylle Hermann, Christian Holm, Miriam Mehl, Guido Reina, Benjamin Uekermann, David Boehringer, Thomas Ertl, Jean-Noël Grad, Dorothea Iglezakis, Alexander Jaust, Timo Koch, Anett Seeland, Rudolf Weeber, Florian Weik, and Kilian Weishaupt. Umgang mit Forschungssoftware an der Universität Stuttgart. Universität Stuttgart, 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten myown software] URL

Simone Lauterbach, Hannah Dienhart, Jan Range, Stephan Malzacher, Jan-Dirk Spöring, Dörte Rother, Maria Filipa Pinto, Pedro Martins, Colton E. Lagerman, Andreas S. Bommarius, Amalie Vang Høst, John M. Woodley, Sandile Ngubane, Tukayi Kudanga, Frank T. Bergmann, Johann M. Rohwer, Dorothea Iglezakis, Andreas Weidemann, Ulrike Wittig, Carsten Kettner, Neil Swainston, Santiago Schnell, and Jürgen Pleiss. EnzymeML: seamless data flow and modeling of enzymatic data. Nature Methods, Feb 9, 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata myown] URL

Yann Le Franc. OntoCommons D3.2 - Report on existing domain ontologies in. Zenodo, 2022. [PUMA: materialwissenschaften metadata ontologie] URL

Graham Lee, Sebastian Bacon, Ian Bush, Laura Fortunato, David Gavaghan, Thibault Lestang, Caroline Morton, Martin Robinson, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, and Helena Webb. Barely sufficient practices in scientific computing. Patterns, (2)2:100206, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten motivation software] URL

Alexander S. Behr, Marc Völkenrath, and Norbert Kockmann. Ontology Extension with NLP-based Concept Extraction for Domain Experts in Catalytic Sciences. Research Square Platform LLC, January 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten machinelearning metadata ontologie] URL

Christian Riedel, Hendrik Geßner, Anja Seegebrecht, Safial Islam Ayon, Shafayet Hossen Chowdhury, Ralf Engbert, and Ulrike Lucke. Including Data Management in Research Culture Increases the Reproducibility of Scientific Results. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn, 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten reproducibility] URL

Maxi Kindling, and Dorothea Strecker. Data Quality Assurance at Research Data Repositories. Data Science Journal, (21)Ubiquity Press, Ltd., 2022. [PUMA: dataQuality forschungsdaten repository survey] URL