Publications

DataCite, and Make Data Count. Data Citation Corpus Data File. DataCite, 2024. [PUMA: forschungsdaten citations] URL

Wolmar Nyberg Åkerström, Kurt Baumann, Oscar Corcho, Romain David, Yann Le Franc, Bénédicte Madon, Barbara Magagna, András Micsik, Marco Molinaro, Milan Ojsteršek, Silvio Peroni, Andrea Scharnhorst, Lars Vogt, and Heinrich Widmann. DRAFT: Developing and implementing the semantic interoperability recommendations of the EOSC Interoperability Framework. EOSC Semantic Interoperability Task Force, 2024. [PUMA: standard forschungsdaten interoperability eosc semanticWeb] URL

Till Kreutzer, and Georg Fischer. Urheberrecht in der Wissenschaft. Ein Überblick für Forschung, Lehre und Bibliotheken. Zenodo, August 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten Urheberrecht rechtlicheFragestellungen] URL

Morane Gruenpeter, Sabrina Granger, Alain Monteil, Neil Chue Hong, Elena Breitmoser, Mario Antonioletti, Daniel Garijo, Esteban González Guardia, Alejandra Gonzalez Beltran, Carole Goble, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Nick Juty, and Gabriela Mejias. D4.4 - Guidelines for recommended metadata standard for research software within EOSC. Zenodo, June 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten standards metadata software eosc] URL

Föderierte Dateninfrastrukturen für die wissenschaftliche Nutzung. NFDI, EOSC und Gaia-X: Vergleich und Anregungen für eine engagierte Mitgestaltung des Ausbaus und der Weiterentwicklung. In RfII – Rat für Informationsinfrastrukturen (Eds.), 4March 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten eosc gaiaX politik nfdi] URL

Simone Lauterbach, Hannah Dienhart, Jan Range, Stephan Malzacher, Jan-Dirk Spöring, Dörte Rother, Maria Filipa Pinto, Pedro Martins, Colton E. Lagerman, Andreas S. Bommarius, Amalie Vang Høst, John M. Woodley, Sandile Ngubane, Tukayi Kudanga, Frank T. Bergmann, Johann M. Rohwer, Dorothea Iglezakis, Andreas Weidemann, Ulrike Wittig, Carsten Kettner, Neil Swainston, Santiago Schnell, and Jürgen Pleiss. EnzymeML: seamless data flow and modeling of enzymatic data. Nature Methods, Feb 9, 2023. [PUMA: myown forschungsdaten metadata] URL

Shilpa Verma, Rajesh Bhatia, Sandeep Harit, and Sanjay Batish. Scholarly knowledge graphs through structuring scholarly communication: a review. Complex & Intelligent Systems, (9)1:1059--1095, Feb 1, 2023. [PUMA: metadata knowledgegraph semanticWeb publications] URL

Alexander S. Behr, Marc Völkenrath, and Norbert Kockmann. Ontology Extension with NLP-based Concept Extraction for Domain Experts in Catalytic Sciences. Research Square Platform LLC, January 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata ontologie machinelearning] URL

Matthew Buys. DataCite Looking Ahead – Global Data Citation Corpus for All Data Citations. Zenodo, 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata citations] URL

Antony Della Vecchia, Michael Joswig, and Benjamin Lorenz. A FAIR File Format for Mathematical Software. 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten mathematics fileformat mardi]

Paul Groth, Elena Simperl, Marieke van Erp, and Denny Vrandečić. Knowledge Graphs and their Role in the Knowledge Engineering of the 21st Century (Dagstuhl Seminar 22372). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata knowledgegraph] URL

Forschungsdatenmanagement in kleinen Forschungsprojekten - Eine Handreichung für die Praxis.. In RatSWD (Rat für Sozial-und Wirtschaftsdaten) (Eds.), RatSWD Output Series, (7. Berufungsperiode)32023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten positionspapier handreichung wirtschaftswissenschaften sozialwissenschaften verhaltenswissenschaften]

Ilkay Melek Yazıcı. DATA PROVENANCE VISUALIZATION METHODOLOGIES. 2023. [PUMA: provenance metadata visualization]

Jianpei Geng, Tetyana Shalomayeva, Mariia Gryzlova, Amlan Mukherjee, Santo Santonocito, Dzhavid Dzhavadzade, Durga Dasari, Hiromitsu Kato, Rainer Stöhr, Andrej Denisenko, Norikazu Mizuochi, and Jörg Wrachtrup. Dopant-assisted stabilization of negatively charged single nitrogen-vacancy centers in phosphorus-doped diamond at low temperatures. 2023. [PUMA: darus]

Timo Koch, Dennis Gläser, Anett Seeland, Sarbani Roy, Katharina Schulze, Kilian Weishaupt, David Boehringer, Sibylle Hermann, and Bernd Flemisch. A sustainable infrastructure concept for improved accessibility, reusability, and archival of research software. 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten software tools repository]

Michael Felderer, Michael Goedicke, Lars Grunske, Wilhelm Hasselbring, Anna-Lena Lamprecht, and Bernhard Rumpe. Toward Research Software Engineering Research. Zenodo, 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata software classification] URL

Ralf Depping. Rechtliche Aspekte des Forschungsdatenmanagements - Eine Einführung. 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten rechtlicheFragestellungen]

Anton Boudreau Ninkov, Chantal Ripp, Kathleen Gregory, Isabella Peters, and Stefanie Haustein. A dataset from a survey investigating disciplinary differences in data citation. Zenodo, 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten citations] URL

Paul Baumann. Rechte an Forschungsdaten. Trier University, 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten urheberrecht rechtlicheFragestellungen gwp] URL

Michael Selzer. Kadi4Mat - Karlsruhe Data Infrastructure for Materials Science. Zenodo, 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten software eln tools] URL

Matthew Hutson. Taking the pain out of data sharing. Nature, (610)7930:220--221, Oct 1, 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten motivation journals sharing] URL

Carlos Martinez-Ortiz, Paula Martinez Lavanchy, Laurents Sesink, Brett G. Olivier, James Meakin, Maaike de Jong, and Maria Cruz. Practical guide to Software Management Plans. Zenodo, October 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten datenmänagementplan software dmp] URL

Susanne Arndt, Benjamin Farnbacher, Marc Fuhrmans, Stephan Hachinger, Johanna Hickmann, Nils Hoppe, Martin Thomas Horsch, Dorothea Iglezakis, Ashish Karmacharya, Giacomo Lanza, Sophia Leimer, Johannes Munke, Džulia Terzijska, Johannes Theissen-Lipp, Cord Wiljes, and Jürgen Windeck. Metadata4Ing: An ontology for describing the generation of research data within a scientific activity.. In Zenodo (Eds.), Zenodo, February 2022. [PUMA: myown forschungsdaten metadata ontologie engineering] URL

The EUA Open Science Agenda 2025. In European University Association (Eds.), February 2022. [PUMA: openScience forschungsdaten fairPrinciples openaccess policy] URL

Evgeny Bobrov. Open Data operationalisieren - Erfahrungen mit der Formulierung überprüfbarer Kriterien. Zenodo, 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten opendata metrics] URL

Maxi Kindling, and Dorothea Strecker. Data Quality Assurance at Research Data Repositories. Data Science Journal, (21)Ubiquity Press, Ltd., 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten dataQuality survey repository] URL

DATENPOLITIK, OPEN SCIENCE UND DATENINFRASTRUKTUREN: AKTUELLE ENTWICKLUNGEN IM EUROPÄISCHEN RAUM. In Rat für Informationsinfrastrukturen (RfII) (Eds.), 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten europa hpc-computing eosc dataSpaces gaiaX politik]

Stephan Druskat, Oliver Bertuch, Guido Juckeland, Oliver Knodel, and Tobias Schlauch. Software publications with rich metadata: state of the art, automated workflows and HERMES concept. 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata software project]

Christian Riedel, Hendrik Geßner, Anja Seegebrecht, Safial Islam Ayon, Shafayet Hossen Chowdhury, Ralf Engbert, and Ulrike Lucke. Including Data Management in Research Culture Increases the Reproducibility of Scientific Results. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn, 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten reproducibility] URL

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Open Science als Teil der Wissenschaftskultur. Positionierung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. Zenodo, 2022. [PUMA: openScience forschungsdaten dfg positionspapier politik] URL

Peter Doorn, Wilko Steinhoff, Maaike Verburg, Marjan Grootveld, and Ingrid Dillo. F-UJI and FAIR Enough tool comparison dataset (European Research Data Landscape study). Zenodo, 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten assessment fairPrinciples metadata] URL

Simon Schmiederer, and Monika Kuberek. Forschungsdaten-Policies für Forschungsprojekte: ein strukturierter Leitfaden. Technische Universität Berlin, 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten leitlinien policy] URL

Theresa Pollinger, Johannes Rentrop, Dirk Pflüger, and Katharina Kormann. A mass-conserving sparse grid combination technique with biorthogonal hierarchical basis functions for kinetic simulations. arXiv, 2022. [PUMA: test] URL

European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, and Innovation. European Research Data Landscape : final report. Publications Office of the European Union, 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten europa positionspapier politik]

Markus Hirsch, Dorothea Iglezakis, Frank Leymann, and Michael Zimmermann. The ReSUS Project - Infrastructure for Sharing Research Software. E-Science-Tage 2021: Share Your Research Data, 267-276, heiBOOKS, 2022. [PUMA: myown forschungsdaten metadata software tools repository] URL

Sheeba Samuel, and Daniel Mietchen. Computational reproducibility of Jupyter notebooks from biomedical publications. 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten jupyter software reproducibility review]

Yann Le Franc. OntoCommons D3.2 - Report on existing domain ontologies in. Zenodo, 2022. [PUMA: metadata ontologie materialwissenschaften] URL

Federica Garbuglia, Bregt Saenen, Vinciane Gaillard, and Claudia Engelhardt. D7.5 Good Practices in FAIR Competence Education. Zenodo, December 2021. [PUMA: bestPractice forschungsdaten training] URL

ERC Scientific Council. Open Research Data and Data Management Plans. In European Commission (Eds.), August 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten europa dmp horizoneurope policy] URL

Dorothea Iglezakis, Marc Fuhrmans, Susanne Arndt, Évariste Demandt, Stephan Hachinger, Daniela Hausen, Giacomo Lanza, Johannes Lipp, Rainer Stotzka, and Džulia Terzijska. Interoperabilität von Metadaten innerhalb der NFDI: Konsortienübergreifender Metadaten-Workshop am 2./3. Juli 2020. Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, 2:124–135, July 2021. [PUMA: myown forschungsdaten metadata workshop] URL

Daniel S. Katz, Morane Gruenpeter, and Tom Honeyman. Taking a fresh look at FAIR for research software. Patterns, (2)3Elsevier, March 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten fairPrinciples software] URL

Hartwig Anzt, Felix Bach, Stephan Druskat, Frank Löffler, Axel Loewe, Bernhard Y. Renard, Gunnar Seemann, Alexander Struck, Elke Achhammer, Piush Aggarwal, Franziska Appel, Michael Bader, Lutz Brusch, Christian Busse, Gerasimos Chourdakis, Piotr Wojciech Dabrowski, Peter Ebert, Bernd Flemisch, Sven Friedl, Bernadette Fritzsch, Maximilian D. Funk, Volker Gast, Florian Goth, Jean-Noël Grad, Jan Hegewald, Sibylle Hermann, Florian Hohmann, Stephan Janosch, Dominik Kutra, Jan Linxweiler, Thilo Muth, Wolfgang Peters-Kottig, Fabian Rack, Fabian H.C. Raters, Stephan Rave, Guido Reina, Malte Reißig, Timo Ropinski, Joerg Schaarschmidt, Heidi Seibold, Jan P. Thiele, Benjamin Uekermann, Stefan Unger, and Rudolf Weeber. An environment for sustainable research software in Germany and beyond: current state, open challenges, and call for action. F1000Research, (9):295, F1000 Research Ltd, January 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata software] URL

Björn Schembera. Like a rainbow in the dark: metadata annotation for HPC applications in the age of dark data. In Hamid Arabnia (Eds.), The Journal of Supercomputing, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten hpc-computing metadata tools automated] URL

Mingfang Wu, Nick Juty, RDA Research Metadata Schemas WG, Julia Collins, Ruth Duerr, Chantel Ridsdale, Adam Shepherd, Chantelle Verhey, and Leyla Jael Castro. Guidelines for publishing structured metadata on the web. In Research Data Alliance (Eds.), 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata schemaOrg rda] URL

Jerry de Vries, Vyacheslav Tykhonov, Andrea Scharnhorst, Eko Indarto, and Femmy Admiraal. Flexible metadata schemes for research data repositories - The Common Framework in Dataverse and the CMDI use case. In Monica Monachini, and Maria Eskevich (Eds.), Proceedings of the CLARIN Annual Conference 2021, 109-118, 2021. [PUMA: CMDI forschungsdaten metadata dataverse]

Philipp Cimiano, Christian Pietsch, and Cord Wiljes. Studies in Analytical Reproducibility: the Conquaire Project. 8057464 bytes, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten psychology software reproducibility analyticalreproducibility] URL

Graham Lee, Sebastian Bacon, Ian Bush, Laura Fortunato, David Gavaghan, Thibault Lestang, Caroline Morton, Martin Robinson, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, and Helena Webb. Barely sufficient practices in scientific computing. Patterns, (2)2:100206, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten motivation software] URL

Martin Thomas Horsch, Joana Francisco Morgado, Gerhard Goldbeck, Dorothea Iglezakis, Natalia A. Konchakova, and Björn Schembera. Domain-specific metadata standardization in materials modelling. Domain Ontologies for Research Data Management in Industry Commons of Materials and Manufacturing, 2021. [PUMA: myown forschungsdaten metadata materialwissenschaften ontology] URL

Morane Gruenpeter, Daniel S. Katz, Anna-Lena Lamprecht, Tom Honeyman, Daniel Garijo, Alexander Struck, Anna Niehues, Paula Andrea Martinez, Leyla Jael Castro, Tovo Rabemanantsoa, Neil P. Chue Hong, Carlos Martinez-Ortiz, Laurents Sesink, Matthias Liffers, Anne Claire Fouilloux, Chris Erdmann, Silvio Peroni, Paula Martinez Lavanchy, Ilian Todorov, and Manodeep Sinha. Defining Research Software: a controversial discussion. Zenodo, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten software definition] URL

Iratxe Puebla, Daniella Lowenberg, and FORCE11 Research Data Publishing Ethics WG. Joint FORCE11 & COPE Research Data Publishing Ethics Working Group Recommendations. Zenodo, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten ethischeFragestellungen autorenschaft repositorien] URL

Lamy Jean-Baptiste. Automatic reasoning. Ontologies with Python: Programming OWL 2.0 Ontologies with Python and Owlready2, 157--185, Apress, Berkeley, CA, 2021. [PUMA: metadata reasoning python semanticWeb hermit] URL

Jens Dierkes. 4.1 Planung, Beschreibung und Dokumentation von Forschungsdaten. In Markus Putnings, Heike Neuroth, and Janna Neumann (Eds.), Praxishandbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement, 303--326, De Gruyter Saur, Berlin, Boston, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten dmp] URL

Peter Brettschneider, Alexandra Axtmann, Elisabeth Böker, and Dirk von Suchodoletz. Offene Lizenzen für Forschungsdaten - Rechtliche Bewertung und Praxistauglichkeit verbreiteter Lizenzmodelle. In Herausgeber VDB (Eds.), O-Bib. Das Offene Bibliotheksjournal, (8)3:1-22, 2021. [PUMA: openScience forschungsdaten rechtlicheFragestellungen lizenz]

Dorothea Iglezakis, and Sibylle Hermann. 4.4 Disziplinspezifische und –konvergente FDM-Projekte. In Markus Putnings, Heike Neuroth, and Janna Neumann (Eds.), Praxishandbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement, 381--398, De Gruyter Saur, 2021. [PUMA: myown forschungsdaten project] URL

UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. In UNESCO (Eds.), 2021. [PUMA: openScience forschungsdaten positionspapier openaccess politik] URL

Lisa Käde. Kreative Maschinen und Urheberrecht. Datenrecht und neue Technologien, (2)Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten urheberrecht rechtlicheFragestellungen ki] URL

Johannes Lipp, Lars Gleim, Michael Cochez, Iraklis Dimitriadis, Hussain Ali, Daniel Hoppe Alvarez, Christoph Lange, and Stefan Decker. Towards Easy Vocabulary Drafts with Neologism 2.0. ESWC2021 Poster and Demo Track, 2021. [PUMA: metadata ontologie tools] URL

Felicitas Kleinkopf, Janina Jacke, and Markus Gärtner. Urheberrechtliche Grenzen der Nachnutzung wissenschaftlicher Korpora bei computergestützten Verfahren und digitalen Ressourcen. 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten Korpora TextDataMining rechtlicheFragestellungen]

Neil P. Chue Hong, Daniel S. Katz, Michelle Barker, Anna-Lena Lamprecht, Carlos Martinez, Fotis E. Psomopoulos, Jen Harrow, Leyla Jael Castro, Morane Gruenpeter, Paula Andrea Martinez, and Tom Honeyman. FAIR Principles for Research Software (FAIR4RS Principles). Research Data Alliance, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten fairPrinciples software] URL

Josh Brown, Phill Jones, Alice Meadows, and Fiona Murphy. The PID-optimised Research Lifecycle. Zenodo, 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten persistentIdentifier] URL

Kerstin Helbig, Ivonne Anders, Petra Buchholz, Gianpiero Favella, Daniela Hausen, Sonja Hendriks, Jochen Klar, Evamaria Krause, Thilo Paul-Stüve, Karsten Peters, Torsten Rathmann, Stephanie Rehwald, Jessica Rex, Volker Soßna, Johannes Sperling, Annette Strauch, and Pia Voigt. Erfahrungen und Empfehlungen aus der Beratung bei Datenmanagementplänen. Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, 2:29–40, Okt. 2020. [PUMA: checklisten forschungsdaten dmp tools] URL

Der Aufbau einer Nationalen Forschungsdateninfrastruktur (NFDI) - Zweite Stellungnahme des NFDI-Expertengremiums. In NFDI Expertengremium (Eds.), November 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten positionspapier politik nfdi] URL

Zum Wandel in den Wissenschaften durch datenintensive Forschung. In Wissenschaftsrat (Eds.), October 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten digitalisierung positionspapier politik] URL

Digitaler Wandel in den Wissenschaften. In DFG (Eds.), October 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten digitalisierung positionspapier politik] URL

Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA) of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). In European Commission (Eds.), October 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten fairPrinciples strategie eosc] URL

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Digitaler Wandel in den Wissenschaften. Zenodo, October 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten digitalisierung positionspapier politik] URL

Roberto Di Cosmo, Morane Gruenpeter, Bruno Marmol, Alain Monteil, Laurent Romary, and Jozefina Sadowska. Curated Archiving of Research Software Artifacts: Lessons Learned from the French Open Archive (HAL). International Journal of Digital Curation, (15)1:16, Edinburgh University Library, August 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten software curation quality repository] URL

Alison Spence, Valerie McCutcheon, and Mary Donaldson. University of Glasgow Electronic Research Notebook Case Study. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, July 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten elektronischesLaborbuch] URL

Hartwig Anzt, Felix Bach, Stephan Druskat, Frank Löffler, Axel Loewe, Bernhard Y. Renard, Gunnar Seemann, Alexander Struck, Elke Achhammer, Piush Aggarwal, Franziska Appel, Michael Bader, Lutz Brusch, Christian Busse, Gerasimos Chourdakis, Piotr Wojciech Dabrowski, Peter Ebert, Bernd Flemisch, Sven Friedl, Bernadette Fritzsch, Maximilian D. Funk, Volker Gast, Florian Goth, Jean-Noël Grad, Sibylle Hermann, Florian Hohmann, Stephan Janosch, Dominik Kutra, Jan Linxweiler, Thilo Muth, Wolfgang Peters-Kottig, Fabian Rack, Fabian H.C. Raters, Stephan Rave, Guido Reina, Malte Reißig, Timo Ropinski, Joerg Schaarschmidt, Heidi Seibold, Jan P. Thiele, Benjamin Uekermann, Stefan Unger, and Rudolf Weeber. An environment for sustainable research software in Germany and beyond: current state, open challenges, and call for action. F1000Research, (9):295, F1000 Research Ltd, April 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten software] URL

Pierre Tremouilhac, Chia-Lin Lin, Pei-Chi Huang, Yu-Chieh Huang, An Nguyen, Nicole Jung, Felix Bach, Robert Ulrich, Bernhard Neumair, Achim Streit, and Stefan Bräse. The Repository Chemotion: Infrastructure for Sustainable Research in Chemistry. April 2020. [PUMA: chemie forschungsdaten tools repository] URL

Giovanni Colavizza, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Isla Staden, Kirstie Whitaker, and Barbara McGillivray. The citation advantage of linking publications to research data. PLOS ONE, (15)4:1-18, Public Library of Science, April 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten motivation credit] URL

Sibylle Hermann, Martin Schneider, Bernd Flemisch, Steffen Frey, Dorothea Iglezakis, Matthias Ruf, Björn Schembera, Anett Seeland, and Holger Steeb. Datenmanagement im SFB 1313. Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, 1:28-38, April 2020. [PUMA: myown forschungsdaten metadata engineering] URL

Friederike Kleinfercher, Sandra Vengadasalam, and James Lawton. bloxberg: The Trusted Research Infrastructure. February 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten blockchain intellectualProperty certification] URL

Sarah Oppold, and Melanie Herschel. Accountable Data Analytics Start with Accountable Data: The LiQuID Metadata Model. 2020. [PUMA: metadata rechtlicheFragestellungen ethischeFragestellungen quality]

Dataverse Admin, and Dorothea Iglezakis. Ein schöner Titel zum Testen des Puma-Exports. 2020. [PUMA: darus unbearbeitet] URL

Dorothea Iglezakis. Replication Data for: EngMeta - Metadata für Computational Engineering. 2020. [PUMA: darus unbearbeitet] URL

Maggie Hellström, André Heughebaert, Rachael Kotarski, Paolo Manghi, Brian Matthews, Raphael Ritz, Anders Sparre Conrad, Mrio Valle, Tobias Weigel, and Peter Wittenburg. A Persistent Identifier (PID) policy for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). In Directorate-General for Research, Innovation (European Commission), and EOSC Executive Board (Eds.), 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten pid policy] URL

Arno Kesper, Viola Wenz, and Gabriele Taentzer. Detecting Quality Problems in Research Data: A Model-Driven Approach. 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata quality] URL

A survey of Top-Level Ontologies. In The Construction Innovation Hub (Eds.), 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata ontologie top-level-ontologien report]

Björn Selent, Hamzeh Kraus, Niels Hansen, Björn Schembera, Anett Seeland, and Dorothea Iglezakis. Management of Research Data in Computational Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics. In Vincent Heuveline, Fabian Gebhart, and Nina Mohammadianbisheh (Eds.), E-Science-Tage 2019: Data to Knowledge, 128-139, HeiBOOKS, Heidelberg, 2020. [PUMA: myown forschungsdaten metadata aerodynamics project_dipling thermodynamics engineering repository]

Björn Schembera, and Dorothea Iglezakis. EngMeta -- Metadata for Computational Engineering. 2020. [PUMA: myown metadata project_dipling engineering] URL

Thomas Wirth. Die Pflicht zur Löschung von Forschungsdaten – Urheber- und Datenschutzrecht im Widerspruch zu den Erfordernissen guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis?. Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht (ZUM), (64)8/9:585-592, 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten rechtlicheFragestellungen] URL

Dorothea Iglezakis. Noch noch Neuerer Testtitel für PUMA Workflow. 2020. [PUMA: darus unbearbeitet]

Bernd Flemisch, Sibylle Hermann, Christian Holm, Miriam Mehl, Guido Reina, Benjamin Uekermann, David Boehringer, Thomas Ertl, Jean-Noël Grad, Dorothea Iglezakis, Alexander Jaust, Timo Koch, Anett Seeland, Rudolf Weeber, Florian Weik, and Kilian Weishaupt. Umgang mit Forschungssoftware an der Universität Stuttgart. Universität Stuttgart, 2020. [PUMA: myown forschungsdaten software] URL

Lea Maria Ferguson, H. Pampel, Christoph Bruch, Roland Bertelmann, Nina Leonie Weisweiler, Antonia C. Schrader, Reinhard Messerschmidt, and Katja Faensen. Gute (digitale) wissenschaftliche Praxis und Open Science: Support und Best Practices zur Umsetzung des DFG-Kodex „Leitlinien zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis“. Helmholtz Open Science Briefing, Helmholtz Open Science Office, Potsdam, 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten leitlinien gwp]

Katarzyna Biernacka. LEGO® Metadaten für die Reproduzierbarkeit. Zenodo, 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata schulung spiel] URL

Benedikt Heinrichs, and Marius Politze. Moving towards a General Metadata Extraction Solution for Research Data with State-of-the-Art Methods.. KDIR, 227--234, 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata harvesting similarity tools]

Matthias Ruf, and Holger Steeb. An open, modular, and flexible micro X-ray computed tomography system for research. Review of Scientific Instruments, (91)11:113102, 2020. [PUMA: sfb1313 x-ray relatedpublication tools] URL

European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, and Innovation. Scholarly infrastructures for research software : report from the EOSC Executive Board Working Group (WG) Architecture Task Force (TF) SIRS. Publications Office, 2020. [PUMA: infrastruktur forschungsdaten software eosc]

Björn Schembera, and Dorothea Iglezakis. EngMeta - Metadata for Computational Engineering. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, (14)1:26-38, 2020. [PUMA: schema myown forschungsdaten metadata project_dipling xml engineering]

Uwe Konrad, Konrad Förstner, Johannes Reetz, Klaus Wannemacher, Jürgen Kett, and Florian Mannseicher. Digitale Dienste für die Wissenschaft - wohin geht die Reise?. Zenodo, 2020. [PUMA: infrastruktur forschungsdaten positionspapier] URL

Maggie Hellström, André Heughebaert, Rachael Kotarski, Paolo Manghi, Brian Matthews, Raphael Ritz, Anders Sparre Conrad, Tobias Weigel, Peter Wittenburg, and Mario Valle. Second draft Persistent Identifier (PID) policy for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). Zenodo, 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten eosc policy persistentIdentifier] URL

Stellungnahme zum Kerndatensatz Forschung. In Wissenschaftsrat (Eds.), 2020. [PUMA: kerndatensatzForschung politik]

Wim Hugo, Yann Le Franc, Gerard Coen, Jessica Parland-von Essen, and Luiz Bonino. D2.5 FAIR Semantics Recommendations Second Iteration. Zenodo, 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata ontologie recommendation semanticWeb] URL

EOSC Executive Board Working Group (WG) Architecture Task Force (TF) SIRS. Scholarly infrastructures for research software. In European Commission (Eds.), 2020. [PUMA: infrastruktur forschungsdaten software eosc] URL

Ana Trisovic, Philip Durbin, Tania Schlatter, Gustavo Durand, Sonia Barbosa, Danny Brooke, and Mercè Crosas. Advancing computational reproducibility in the Dataverse data repository platform. 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten software repository] URL

Marcel Kubis, Magdalena Naczinsky, Annika Selzer, Tim Sperlich, Simone Steiner, and Ulrich Waldmann. Der digitale nachlass - Eine Untersuchung aus rechtlicher und technischer Sicht. In Fraunhofer-Institut für Sichere Informationstechnologie, Universität Bremen/IGMR, and Universität Regensburg (Eds.), Dezember 2019. [PUMA: forschungsdaten rechtlicheFragestellungen digitalerNachlass] URL

Martin Thomas Horsch, Christoph Niethammer, Gianluca Boccardo, Paola Carbone, Silvia Chiacchiera, Mara Chiricotto, Joshua D. Elliott, Vladimir Lobaskin, Philipp Neumann, Peter Schiffels, Michael A. Seaton, Ilian T. Todorov, Jadran Vrabec, and Welchy Leite Cavalcanti. Semantic Interoperability and Characterization of Data Provenance in Computational Molecular Engineering. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, (65)3:1313--1329, American Chemical Society (ACS), December 2019. [PUMA: forschungsdaten hpc-computing metadata ontologie molecularSimulation] URL

Sonja Kümmet, Stephan Lücke, Julian Schulz, Martin Spenger, and Tobias Weber. DataCite Best Practice Guide. Zenodo, November 2019. [PUMA: bestPractice forschungsdaten metadata dataCite] URL

Anna-Lena Lamprecht, Leyla Garcia, Mateusz Kuzak, Carlos Martinez, Ricardo Arcila, Eva Martin Del Pico, Victoria Dominguez Del Angel, Stephanie van de Sandt, Jon Ison, Paula Andrea Martinez, Peter McQuilton, Alfonso Valencia, Jennifer Harrow, Fotis Psomopoulos, Josep Ll. Gelpi, Neil Chue Hong, Carole Goble, and Salvador Capella-Gutierrez. Towards FAIR principles for~research~software. In Paul Groth (Eds.), Data Science, 1--23, IOS Press, November 2019. [PUMA: forschungsdaten fairPrinciples software] URL