Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).
Cite this publication
More citation styles
- please select -
%0 Journal Article
%1 scheer2017ambivalent
%A Scheer, Dirk
%A Konrad, Wilfried
%A Wassermann, Sandra
%D 2017
%I Elsevier
%J Energy policy
%K
%P 89-100
%R 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.061
%T The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: A qualitative study of public perceptions towards energy technologies and portfolios in Germany
%V 100
@article{scheer2017ambivalent,
added-at = {2023-08-31T14:50:12.000+0200},
affiliation = {Scheer, D (Reprint Author), Univ Stuttgart, Stuttgart Res Ctr Interdisciplinary Risk & Innova, Seidenstr 36, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany.
Scheer, Dirk; Wassermann, Sandra, Univ Stuttgart, Stuttgart Res Ctr Interdisciplinary Risk & Innova, Seidenstr 36, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany.
Konrad, Wilfried, DIALOGIK Nonprofit Inst Commun & Cooperat Res, Lerchenstr 22, D-70176 Stuttgart, Germany.},
author = {Scheer, Dirk and Konrad, Wilfried and Wassermann, Sandra},
biburl = {https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/251553050f8c07736125c64d8bc7ebb00/puma-wartung},
doi = {10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.061},
interhash = {2310fcf6e2e56d6a5dd12c02dc69f8ae},
intrahash = {51553050f8c07736125c64d8bc7ebb00},
issn = {{1873-6777} and {0301-4215}},
journal = {Energy policy},
keywords = {},
language = {eng},
pages = {89-100},
publisher = {Elsevier},
research-areas = {Business & Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences & Ecology},
timestamp = {2023-08-31T12:50:12.000+0200},
title = {The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: A qualitative study of public perceptions towards energy technologies and portfolios in Germany},
unique-id = {ISI:000391903900010},
volume = 100,
year = 2017
}