06 - Egocentric spatial representation in action and perception
R. Briscoe. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, (in press)
Abstract
Neuropsychological findings used to motivate the ?two visual systems? hypothesis have been taken to endanger a pair of widely accepted claims about spatial representation in conscious visual experience. The first is the claim that visual experience represents 3-D space around the perceiver using an egocentric frame of reference. The second is the claim that there is a constitutive link between the spatial contents of visual experience and the perceiver?s bodily actions. In this paper, I review and assess three main sources of evidence for the two visual systems hypothesis. I argue that the best interpretation of the evidence is in fact consistent with both claims. I conclude with some brief remarks on the relation between visual consciousness and rational agency.
Briscoe - Egocentric spatial representation in action and pe.pdf:/home/alberto/Zotero/storage/4JVS7V4C/Briscoe - Egocentric spatial representation in action and pe.pdf:application/pdf
%0 Journal Article
%1 briscoe_6_nodate
%A Briscoe, Robert
%D in press
%J Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
%K apa cannot_import edited imported must_be_fixed_after_export periodical
%T 06 - Egocentric spatial representation in action and perception
%U http://cogprints.org/5780/1/ECSRAP.F07.pdf
%X Neuropsychological findings used to motivate the ?two visual systems? hypothesis have been taken to endanger a pair of widely accepted claims about spatial representation in conscious visual experience. The first is the claim that visual experience represents 3-D space around the perceiver using an egocentric frame of reference. The second is the claim that there is a constitutive link between the spatial contents of visual experience and the perceiver?s bodily actions. In this paper, I review and assess three main sources of evidence for the two visual systems hypothesis. I argue that the best interpretation of the evidence is in fact consistent with both claims. I conclude with some brief remarks on the relation between visual consciousness and rational agency.
@article{briscoe_6_nodate,
abstract = {Neuropsychological findings used to motivate the ?two visual systems? hypothesis have been taken to endanger a pair of widely accepted claims about spatial representation in conscious visual experience. The first is the claim that visual experience represents 3-D space around the perceiver using an egocentric frame of reference. The second is the claim that there is a constitutive link between the spatial contents of visual experience and the perceiver?s bodily actions. In this paper, I review and assess three main sources of evidence for the two visual systems hypothesis. I argue that the best interpretation of the evidence is in fact consistent with both claims. I conclude with some brief remarks on the relation between visual consciousness and rational agency.},
added-at = {2019-11-22T15:01:58.000+0100},
author = {Briscoe, Robert},
biburl = {https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/239e6f9c8da1aaf3d8e902f2fdfccbb5b/gallardo},
file = {Briscoe - Egocentric spatial representation in action and pe.pdf:/home/alberto/Zotero/storage/4JVS7V4C/Briscoe - Egocentric spatial representation in action and pe.pdf:application/pdf},
interhash = {fbd25156405a1c4ad3f79f38cef6a278},
intrahash = {39e6f9c8da1aaf3d8e902f2fdfccbb5b},
issn = {0031-8205},
journal = {Philosophy and Phenomenological Research},
keywords = {apa cannot_import edited imported must_be_fixed_after_export periodical},
timestamp = {2019-11-22T14:02:04.000+0100},
title = {06 - {Egocentric} spatial representation in action and perception},
url = {http://cogprints.org/5780/1/ECSRAP.F07.pdf},
urldate = {2019-11-20},
year = {in press}
}