%0 Journal Article %1 leonelli2022science %A Leonelli, Sabina %B Philosophy of Science %D 2022 %I Cambridge University Press %K diversity diversität epistemic epistemische open philosophie science wissenschaft wissenschaftsphilosophie %N 5 %P 991-1001-- %R DOI: 10.1017/psa.2022.45 %T Open Science and Epistemic Diversity: Friends or Foes? %U https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/open-science-and-epistemic-diversity-friends-or-foes/6206992DB99036C83549E1BE5348E04E %V 89 %X I argue that Open Science as currently conceptualized and implemented does not take sufficient account of epistemic diversity within research. I use three case studies to exemplify how Open Science threatens to privilege some forms of inquiry over others, thus exasperating divides within and across systems of practice, and overlooking important sources and forms of epistemic diversity. Building on insights from pluralist philosophy, I then identify four aspects of diverse research practices that should serve as reference points for debates around Open Science: (1) specificity to local conditions, (2) entrenchment within repertoires, (3) permeability to newcomers, and (4) demarcation strategies.

@article{leonelli2022science, abstract = {I argue that Open Science as currently conceptualized and implemented does not take sufficient account of epistemic diversity within research. I use three case studies to exemplify how Open Science threatens to privilege some forms of inquiry over others, thus exasperating divides within and across systems of practice, and overlooking important sources and forms of epistemic diversity. Building on insights from pluralist philosophy, I then identify four aspects of diverse research practices that should serve as reference points for debates around Open Science: (1) specificity to local conditions, (2) entrenchment within repertoires, (3) permeability to newcomers, and (4) demarcation strategies.}, added-at = {2023-10-02T17:09:20.000+0200}, author = {Leonelli, Sabina}, biburl = {https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2e81a77ff5cf8473bf4f00b865e251e5f/droessler}, booktitle = {Philosophy of Science}, doi = {DOI: 10.1017/psa.2022.45}, interhash = {ad47fbc115b06e98ca2c0fb500d42afc}, intrahash = {e81a77ff5cf8473bf4f00b865e251e5f}, issn = {00318248}, keywords = {diversity diversität epistemic epistemische open philosophie science wissenschaft wissenschaftsphilosophie}, number = 5, pages = {991-1001--}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, timestamp = {2023-10-02T17:09:20.000+0200}, title = {Open Science and Epistemic Diversity: Friends or Foes?}, url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/open-science-and-epistemic-diversity-friends-or-foes/6206992DB99036C83549E1BE5348E04E}, volume = 89, year = 2022 }