The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science
Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).
Cite this publication
More citation styles
- please select -
%0 Journal Article
%1 benda2011predictive
%A Benda, Wim G.G.
%A Engels, Tim C.E.
%D 2011
%J International Journal of Forecasting
%K access beitrag imported infrastruktur mittermaier open philosophie tagungsband vertrackte
%N 1
%P 166--182
%R 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.03.003
%T The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science
%U https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.03.003
%V 27
@article{benda2011predictive,
added-at = {2024-09-04T15:30:19.000+0200},
author = {Benda, Wim G.G. and Engels, Tim C.E.},
biburl = {https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2d3a1a75b0d73a6c9d95c0fea31b67b44/droessler},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.03.003},
interhash = {a01522d766e72349adcadb4225e266d7},
intrahash = {d3a1a75b0d73a6c9d95c0fea31b67b44},
issn = {01692070},
journal = {{International Journal of Forecasting}},
keywords = {access beitrag imported infrastruktur mittermaier open philosophie tagungsband vertrackte},
number = 1,
pages = {166--182},
timestamp = {2024-09-04T15:30:19.000+0200},
title = {{The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.03.003},
volume = 27,
year = 2011
}