With the dissemination of additive manufacturing (AM), numerous methods have emerged to support the design process. One possibility is to improve functional solutions through AM-conformal design. Literature-based criteria for the assessment of AM-conformity already exist. Within our study, we address the gap in criteria between a theoretical perspective and a practitioner's perspective. To this end, we first explain the application of the criteria through a use case and conduct an evaluation in an industrial environment adding practitioner's criteria to enable the assessment of AM-conformity.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 tuzun2022additive
%A Tüzün, Gregory-Jamie
%A Roth, Daniel
%A Kreimeyer, Matthias
%B Proceedings of the Design Society
%D 2022
%K 2022 IKTD MPE Tagungsbeitrag
%P 1481-1490
%R 10.1017/pds.2022.150
%T Additive Manufacturing Conformity – A Practical View
%U https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-design-society/article/additive-manufacturing-conformity-a-practical-view/87C27F5200B2BA3D2E4C680E49568B97#article
%V 2
%X With the dissemination of additive manufacturing (AM), numerous methods have emerged to support the design process. One possibility is to improve functional solutions through AM-conformal design. Literature-based criteria for the assessment of AM-conformity already exist. Within our study, we address the gap in criteria between a theoretical perspective and a practitioner's perspective. To this end, we first explain the application of the criteria through a use case and conduct an evaluation in an industrial environment adding practitioner's criteria to enable the assessment of AM-conformity.
@inproceedings{tuzun2022additive,
abstract = {With the dissemination of additive manufacturing (AM), numerous methods have emerged to support the design process. One possibility is to improve functional solutions through AM-conformal design. Literature-based criteria for the assessment of AM-conformity already exist. Within our study, we address the gap in criteria between a theoretical perspective and a practitioner's perspective. To this end, we first explain the application of the criteria through a use case and conduct an evaluation in an industrial environment adding practitioner's criteria to enable the assessment of AM-conformity.},
added-at = {2023-10-16T10:53:02.000+0200},
author = {Tüzün, Gregory-Jamie and Roth, Daniel and Kreimeyer, Matthias},
biburl = {https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/246e0e52ef50aceaf4cd5ae519df8e595/iktd_group},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Design Society},
doi = {10.1017/pds.2022.150},
eventtitle = {DESIGN 2022},
interhash = {d5f302f96b8d1732a5f73fc1268154a7},
intrahash = {46e0e52ef50aceaf4cd5ae519df8e595},
keywords = {2022 IKTD MPE Tagungsbeitrag},
language = {English},
pages = {1481-1490},
timestamp = {2023-10-16T10:54:35.000+0200},
title = {Additive Manufacturing Conformity – A Practical View},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-design-society/article/additive-manufacturing-conformity-a-practical-view/87C27F5200B2BA3D2E4C680E49568B97#article},
volume = 2,
year = 2022
}
