%0 Conference Paper %1 8965196 %A Häberle, M. %A Djekic, D. %A Rajabzadeh, M. %A Fantner, G. E. %A Lips, K. %A Ortmanns, M. %A Anders, J. %B 2019 26th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS) %D 2019 %K MEPR from:jens.anders %P 699-702 %R 10.1109/ICECS46596.2019.8965196 %T Comparison of Different Precision Pseudo Resistor Realizations in the DC-Feedback of Capacitive Transimpedance Amplifiers %U https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8965196/ %X In this paper, three different pseudo resistor (PR) realizations are compared regarding their noise and linearity performance within the DC feedback loop of an integrator-differentiator transimpedance amplifier (I-D-TIA). Thanks to its intrinsic shot noise suppression, the multi-element pseudo resistor (MEPR) shows the best SNDR for small AC signals around a large DC current. In contrast, for large AC signals around comparably small DC currents, the transconductor based PR introduced by Ferrari et al. in 1 displays a rail-to-rail signal swing capability and a small THD of 0.4% resulting in the best achievable SNDR value. All simulations have been performed on transistor level in a 180 nm SOI CMOS technology with a 1.8 V supply.

@inproceedings{8965196, abstract = {In this paper, three different pseudo resistor (PR) realizations are compared regarding their noise and linearity performance within the DC feedback loop of an integrator-differentiator transimpedance amplifier (I-D-TIA). Thanks to its intrinsic shot noise suppression, the multi-element pseudo resistor (MEPR) shows the best SNDR for small AC signals around a large DC current. In contrast, for large AC signals around comparably small DC currents, the transconductor based PR introduced by Ferrari et al. in [1] displays a rail-to-rail signal swing capability and a small THD of 0.4% resulting in the best achievable SNDR value. All simulations have been performed on transistor level in a 180 nm SOI CMOS technology with a 1.8 V supply.}, added-at = {2020-10-12T15:43:30.000+0200}, author = {{Häberle}, M. and {Djekic}, D. and {Rajabzadeh}, M. and {Fantner}, G. E. and {Lips}, K. and {Ortmanns}, M. and {Anders}, J.}, biburl = {https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2d51ae95300f197698d06642d0aea3760/iis}, booktitle = {2019 26th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS)}, doi = {10.1109/ICECS46596.2019.8965196}, interhash = {dd102aa2943aa5079293bfc8a3f5a1cc}, intrahash = {d51ae95300f197698d06642d0aea3760}, keywords = {MEPR from:jens.anders}, month = nov, pages = {699-702}, timestamp = {2020-10-12T13:43:30.000+0200}, title = {Comparison of Different Precision Pseudo Resistor Realizations in the DC-Feedback of Capacitive Transimpedance Amplifiers}, url = {https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8965196/}, year = 2019 }