%0 Conference Paper %1 10.1007/978-3-030-98876-0_17 %A Jung, Kerstin %A Schembera, Björn %A Gärtner, Markus %B Metadata and Semantic Research %C Cham %D 2022 %E Garoufallou, Emmanouel %E Ovalle-Perandones, María-Antonia %E Vlachidis, Andreas %I Springer International Publishing %K %P 199--205 %T Best of Both Worlds? Mapping Process Metadata in Digital Humanities and Computational Engineering %X Process metadata constitute a relevant part of the documentation of research processes and the creation and use of research data. As an addition to publications on the research question, they capture details needed for reusability and comparability and are thus important for a sustainable handling of research data. In the DH project SDC4Lit we want to capture process metadata when researchers work with literary material, conducting manual and automatic processing steps, which need to be treated with equal emphasis. We present a content-related mapping between two process metadata schemas from the area of Digital Humanities (GRAIN, RePlay-DH) and one from Computational Engineering (EngMeta) and find that there are no basic obstacles preventing the use of any of them for our purposes. Actually a basic difference rather exists between GRAIN on the one hand and RePlay-DH and EngMeta on the other, regarding the treatment of tools and actors in a workflow step. %@ 978-3-030-98876-0

@inproceedings{10.1007/978-3-030-98876-0_17, abstract = {Process metadata constitute a relevant part of the documentation of research processes and the creation and use of research data. As an addition to publications on the research question, they capture details needed for reusability and comparability and are thus important for a sustainable handling of research data. In the DH project SDC4Lit we want to capture process metadata when researchers work with literary material, conducting manual and automatic processing steps, which need to be treated with equal emphasis. We present a content-related mapping between two process metadata schemas from the area of Digital Humanities (GRAIN, RePlay-DH) and one from Computational Engineering (EngMeta) and find that there are no basic obstacles preventing the use of any of them for our purposes. Actually a basic difference rather exists between GRAIN on the one hand and RePlay-DH and EngMeta on the other, regarding the treatment of tools and actors in a workflow step.}, added-at = {2022-03-31T16:11:26.000+0200}, address = {Cham}, author = {Jung, Kerstin and Schembera, Bj{\"o}rn and G{\"a}rtner, Markus}, biburl = {https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2dffc059f1452f877f8522ccadd262447/bjoernschembera}, booktitle = {Metadata and Semantic Research}, editor = {Garoufallou, Emmanouel and Ovalle-Perandones, Mar{\'i}a-Antonia and Vlachidis, Andreas}, interhash = {a15b6f098a3a00048ce3ccf4b91f7c96}, intrahash = {dffc059f1452f877f8522ccadd262447}, isbn = {978-3-030-98876-0}, keywords = {}, pages = {199--205}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, timestamp = {2022-03-31T14:11:26.000+0200}, title = {Best of Both Worlds? Mapping Process Metadata in Digital Humanities and Computational Engineering}, year = 2022 }