A general stability analysis on regional and national voting schemes against noise - why is an electoral college more stable than a direct popular election?
Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).
Cite this publication
More citation styles
- please select -
%0 Journal Article
%1 journals/ai/ChenT05
%A Chen, Liang
%A Tokuda, Naoyuki
%D 2005
%J Artif. Intell.
%K dblp
%N 1
%P 47-66
%T A general stability analysis on regional and national voting schemes against noise - why is an electoral college more stable than a direct popular election?
%U http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/ai/ai163.html#ChenT05
%V 163
@article{journals/ai/ChenT05,
added-at = {2005-05-06T00:00:00.000+0200},
author = {Chen, Liang and Tokuda, Naoyuki},
biburl = {https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/236b557f2c50363cdd36d22e1ff404aa6/dblp},
ee = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2004.09.004},
interhash = {6804fd44ffcf422472a1e6b4ab2b7d89},
intrahash = {36b557f2c50363cdd36d22e1ff404aa6},
journal = {Artif. Intell.},
keywords = {dblp},
number = 1,
pages = {47-66},
timestamp = {2016-02-02T03:22:34.000+0100},
title = {A general stability analysis on regional and national voting schemes against noise - why is an electoral college more stable than a direct popular election?},
url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/ai/ai163.html#ChenT05},
volume = 163,
year = 2005
}
