<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:community="http://www.bibsonomy.org/ontologies/2008/05/community#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xml:base="https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/user/open-access/processing"><owl:Ontology rdf:about=""><rdfs:comment>PUMA publications for /user/open-access/processing</rdfs:comment><owl:imports rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology/portal"/></owl:Ontology><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69/open-access"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="/uri/bibtex/2fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69/open-access"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Misc"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10393/42327"/><swrc:date>Tue Dec 07 20:53:54 CET 2021</swrc:date><swrc:month>06</swrc:month><swrc:title>Open access article processing charges 2011 - 2021</swrc:title><swrc:year>2021</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>access kosten article scholarly apc journal charges processing publishing open studie from:droessler </swrc:keywords><swrc:day>24</swrc:day><swrc:abstract>This study examines trends in open access article processing charges (APCs) from 2011 – 2021, building on a 2011 study by Solomon &amp; Björk (2012). Two methods are employed, a modified replica and a status update of the 2011 journals. Data is drawn from multiple sources and datasets are available as open data (Morrison et al, 2021). Most journals do not charge APCs; this has not changed. The global average per-journal APC increased slightly, from 906 USD to 958 USD, while the per-article average increased from 904 USD to 1,626 USD, indicating that authors choose to publish in more expensive journals. Publisher size, type, impact metrics and subject affect charging tendencies, average APC and pricing trends. About half the journals from the 2011 sample are no longer listed in DOAJ in 2021, due to ceased publication or publisher de-listing. Conclusions include a caution about the potential of the APC model to increase costs beyond inflation, and a suggestion that support for the university sector, responsible for the majority of journals, nearly half the articles, with a tendency not to charge and very low average APCs, may be the most promising approach to achieve economically sustainable no-fee OA journal publishing.</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Heather Morrison"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Luan Borges"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Xuan Zhao"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Tanoh Laurent Kakou"/></rdf:_4><rdf:_5><swrc:Person swrc:name="Amit Nataraj Shanbhoug"/></rdf:_5></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>