<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:community="http://www.bibsonomy.org/ontologies/2008/05/community#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xml:base="https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/tag/processing%20Processing%20article%20APC"><owl:Ontology rdf:about=""><rdfs:comment>PUMA publications for /tag/processing%20Processing%20article%20APC</rdfs:comment><owl:imports rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology/portal"/></owl:Ontology><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2576f17fdcd32ebb4f299bd7e6676075b/droessler"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="/uri/bibtex/2576f17fdcd32ebb4f299bd7e6676075b/droessler"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00272"/><swrc:date>Thu Oct 31 20:20:25 CET 2024</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Quantitative Science Studies</swrc:journal><swrc:month>nov</swrc:month><swrc:number>4</swrc:number><swrc:pages>778--799</swrc:pages><swrc:title>The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges</swrc:title><swrc:volume>4</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2023</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>access apc article charges oligopoly open processing publisher publishing </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>We aim to estimate the total amount of article processing charges (APCs) paid to publish open access (OA) in journals controlled by the five large commercial publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor &amp;amp; Francis, and Wiley) between 2015 and 2018. Using publication data from WoS, OA status from Unpaywall, and annual APC prices from open data sets and historical fees retrieved via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, we estimate that globally authors paid $1.06 billion in publication fees to these publishers from 2015–2018. Revenue from gold OA amounted to $612.5 million, and $448.3 million was obtained for publishing OA in hybrid journals. Among the five publishers, Springer Nature made the most revenue from OA ($589.7 million), followed by Elsevier ($221.4 million), Wiley ($114.3 million), Taylor &amp;amp; Francis ($76.8 million), and Sage ($31.6 million). With Elsevier and Wiley making most of their APC revenue from hybrid fees and others focusing on gold, different OA strategies could be observed between publishers.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="26413337" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1162/qss_a_00272" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Leigh-Ann Butler"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Lisa Matthias"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Marc-André Simard"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Philippe Mongeon"/></rdf:_4><rdf:_5><swrc:Person swrc:name="Stefanie Haustein"/></rdf:_5></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/22451a20cb31195bda30ecb76ad1a9505/droessler"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="/uri/bibtex/22451a20cb31195bda30ecb76ad1a9505/droessler"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Misc"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6817486"/><swrc:date>Tue Jul 19 10:27:11 CEST 2022</swrc:date><swrc:month>07</swrc:month><swrc:title>Bearbeitung und Monitoring von Article Processing Charges an Universitätsbibliotheken in Deutschland. Aktuelle Befunde und Herausforderungen</swrc:title><swrc:year>2022</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>access apc article charges kosten kostenmonitoring monitoring oa open processing </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.5281/zenodo.6817486" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Karin Beckmann"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69/open-access"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="/uri/bibtex/2fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69/open-access"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Misc"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10393/42327"/><swrc:date>Tue Dec 07 20:53:54 CET 2021</swrc:date><swrc:month>06</swrc:month><swrc:title>Open access article processing charges 2011 - 2021</swrc:title><swrc:year>2021</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>access kosten article scholarly apc journal charges processing publishing open studie from:droessler </swrc:keywords><swrc:day>24</swrc:day><swrc:abstract>This study examines trends in open access article processing charges (APCs) from 2011 – 2021, building on a 2011 study by Solomon &amp; Björk (2012). Two methods are employed, a modified replica and a status update of the 2011 journals. Data is drawn from multiple sources and datasets are available as open data (Morrison et al, 2021). Most journals do not charge APCs; this has not changed. The global average per-journal APC increased slightly, from 906 USD to 958 USD, while the per-article average increased from 904 USD to 1,626 USD, indicating that authors choose to publish in more expensive journals. Publisher size, type, impact metrics and subject affect charging tendencies, average APC and pricing trends. About half the journals from the 2011 sample are no longer listed in DOAJ in 2021, due to ceased publication or publisher de-listing. Conclusions include a caution about the potential of the APC model to increase costs beyond inflation, and a suggestion that support for the university sector, responsible for the majority of journals, nearly half the articles, with a tendency not to charge and very low average APCs, may be the most promising approach to achieve economically sustainable no-fee OA journal publishing.</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Heather Morrison"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Luan Borges"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Xuan Zhao"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Tanoh Laurent Kakou"/></rdf:_4><rdf:_5><swrc:Person swrc:name="Amit Nataraj Shanbhoug"/></rdf:_5></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69/droessler"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="/uri/bibtex/2fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69/droessler"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Misc"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10393/42327"/><swrc:date>Tue Dec 07 20:53:30 CET 2021</swrc:date><swrc:month>06</swrc:month><swrc:title>Open access article processing charges 2011 - 2021</swrc:title><swrc:year>2021</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>access apc article charges journal kosten open processing publishing scholarly studie </swrc:keywords><swrc:day>24</swrc:day><swrc:abstract>This study examines trends in open access article processing charges (APCs) from 2011 – 2021, building on a 2011 study by Solomon &amp; Björk (2012). Two methods are employed, a modified replica and a status update of the 2011 journals. Data is drawn from multiple sources and datasets are available as open data (Morrison et al, 2021). Most journals do not charge APCs; this has not changed. The global average per-journal APC increased slightly, from 906 USD to 958 USD, while the per-article average increased from 904 USD to 1,626 USD, indicating that authors choose to publish in more expensive journals. Publisher size, type, impact metrics and subject affect charging tendencies, average APC and pricing trends. About half the journals from the 2011 sample are no longer listed in DOAJ in 2021, due to ceased publication or publisher de-listing. Conclusions include a caution about the potential of the APC model to increase costs beyond inflation, and a suggestion that support for the university sector, responsible for the majority of journals, nearly half the articles, with a tendency not to charge and very low average APCs, may be the most promising approach to achieve economically sustainable no-fee OA journal publishing.</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Heather Morrison"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Luan Borges"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Xuan Zhao"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Tanoh Laurent Kakou"/></rdf:_4><rdf:_5><swrc:Person swrc:name="Amit Nataraj Shanbhoug"/></rdf:_5></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/203c074be60592832de858fb18e5ebf62/droessler"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="/uri/bibtex/203c074be60592832de858fb18e5ebf62/droessler"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03578-3"/><swrc:date>Tue Jun 29 22:43:19 CEST 2021</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Scientometrics</swrc:journal><swrc:month>sep</swrc:month><swrc:number>3</swrc:number><swrc:pages>2185--2206</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Drivers of article processing charges in open access</swrc:title><swrc:volume>124</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2020</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>access apc article charges costs journals oa open processing zeitschriften </swrc:keywords><swrc:day>01</swrc:day><swrc:abstract>Large publishing companies have been dominating scientific publishing for long, which leads to high subscription fees and inhibited access to scientific knowledge. At digital era, the opportunity of an unrestricted access appears feasible, because the cost of publishing should be low. It is no longer the readers and libraries to pay subscription fees, but scientific organizations and authors themselves who pay for the cost of having their article published. As the data shows, there is a tremendous variance of article processing charges (APC) across journals, which obviously cannot be explained by the costs. One of the explanatory variables could be reputation, but it only contributes less than 5{\%} to the variance in average APC. This study is meant to shed light on the various determinants of APC. Based on the data from the OpenAPC Initiative, the Directory of Open Access Journals and three different datasets of Web of Science, we employ ANOVAs and multivariate regressions. The results show that market power plays an important role to explain APC, inter alia, through market concentration, market position of individual publishers (publisher size), and the choice of hybrid publishing model.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="1588-2861" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1007/s11192-020-03578-3" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Oliver Budzinski"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Thomas Grebel"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Jens Wolling"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Xijie Zhang"/></rdf:_4></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2af1731fdd1f24d319fb23b9cb198a282/droessler"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="/uri/bibtex/2af1731fdd1f24d319fb23b9cb198a282/droessler"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-5569"/><swrc:date>Tue May 30 14:54:44 CEST 2017</swrc:date><swrc:title>Open-Access-Anteil bei Zeitschriftenartikeln von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern an Einrichtungen des Landes Berlin. Datenauswertung für die Jahre 2013–2015</swrc:title><swrc:year>2016</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>APC Access Article Berlin Charges Gold Kennzahlen Kosten Open Processing Publikationsanalyse Zeitschriftenartikel access articles journal open </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value=":OAarticles-Berlin-2013-15_report.pdf:PDF" swrc:key="file"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="public" swrc:key="groups"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="af1731fdd1f24d319fb23b9cb198a282" swrc:key="intrahash"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="2ab4bf06d4018302a032517deafe9fd2" swrc:key="interhash"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="2017-05-30 02:54:44" swrc:key="timestamp"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="droessler" swrc:key="username"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Michaela Voigt"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Christian Winterhalter"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><foaf:Group rdf:about="https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/tag/processing%20Processing%20article%20APC"><foaf:name>processing Processing article APC</foaf:name><description>Community for tag(s) processing Processing article APC</description></foaf:Group></rdf:RDF>