European Citizens’ Panels. Final Report of the Evaluation. Stuttgart Contributions to Risk and Sustainability Research. Vol. 7. Stuttgart. Stuttgart University Press, Stuttgart, 2007. [PUMA: zfb-p]
ERiK – Entwicklung eines mehrstufigen Verfahrens der Risikokommunikation. In R. F. Hertel, and G. Henseler (Eds.), Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, Berlin, 2005. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Perceptions of risk, benefit and trust associated with consumer food choice. In Lynn Frewer, and Hans van Trijp (Eds.), Understanding Consumers of Food Products, 125-150, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, 2007. [PUMA: zfb-p] URL
Communicating Chemical Risks. Stuttgart Contributions to Risk and Sustainability Research. No. 10. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 2008. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Simulation der Praxis: Trainingsworkshop zu Methoden der Risikokommunikation im Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR)/Berlin. UmweltMedizinischer InformationsDienst (UMID), (1):18-20, 2006. [PUMA: zfb-p]
"Characterizing Landscapes of Regional Risk Governance". International Journal of Performability Engineering, (11)6:605-618, 2015. [PUMA: zfb-p]
A Framework for the Precautionary Governance of Food Safety: Integrating Science and Participation in the Social Appraisal of Risk. In Elisabeth Fisher, Judith Jones, and René von Schomberg (Eds.), Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Perspectives and Prospects, 284-315, Edwar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2006. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Risk Governance of Pervasive Computing Technologies. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society, (4)1:215-224, 2008. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Diskursive Risikoregulierung - Diskurstheorien im Vergleich. Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2008. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Implementing Structured Participation for Regional Level Waste Management Planning. In S. Hayden Lesbirel, and Daigee Shaw (Eds.), Managing Conflict in Facility Siting. An International Comparison, 135-154, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, 2005. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Bioökonomie als sozio-technische Gestaltungsaufgabe: Anforderungen für eine "Good Governance". Technikfolgenabschätzung : Theorie und Praxis, (24)3:88-90, ITAS, 2015. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Risk governance and emerging technologies : learning from case study integration. Journal of Risk Research, (16)3-4:355-368, Taylor & Francis, 2013. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Systemische Risiken: Charakterisierung, Management und Integration in eine aktive Nachhaltigkeitspolitik. In Frank Beckenbach, Ulrich Hampicke, Christian Leipert, Georg Meran, Jürg Minsch, Hans G. Nutzinger, Reinhard Pfriem, Joachim Weimann, Franz Wirl, and Ulrich Witt (Eds.), Soziale Nachhaltigkeit. Jahrbuch Ökologische Ökonomik, (5):157-188, Metropolis, Marburg, 2007. [PUMA: zfb-p]
The Risk Society Revisited. Social Theory and Governance. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 2014. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Nanotechnology Risk Governance. In Ortwin Renn, and Katherine D. Walker (Eds.), Global Risk Governance. Concept and Practice Using the IRGC Framework. International Risk Governance Council Bookseries 1, 301-327, Springer VS, Berlin und Heidelberg, 2008. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Das Risikoparadox. Warum wir uns vor dem Falschen fürchten. Fischer, München, 2014. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Bewertung und Management von Naturgefahren. Ein integratives, transdisziplinäres Verfahren. Interdisziplinär: Wissenschaft & Umwelt, Heft 10, 135-156, 2006. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Inclusive Risk Governance: Concepts and Application to Environmental Policy Making. Environmental Policy and Governance, (19)3:174-185, 2009. [PUMA: zfb-p]
New Forms of Citizen Involvement. In Oscar W. Gabriel, Silke I. Keil, and Eric Kerrouche (Eds.), Political Participation in France and Germany, 273-295, ECPR Press, Colchester, 2012. [PUMA: zfb-p]
Risiko. Eine interdisziplinäre und integrative Sichtweise des gesellschaftlichen Umgangs mit Risiko. Oekom Verlag, München, 2007. [PUMA: zfb-p]