Publications

Nicola Mößner. Databases, Science Communication, and the Division of Epistemic Labour. Axiomathes, (32)3:853--870, 2022. [PUMA: communication database epistemic epistemology fleck information labour ludwig philosophy science scopus technology] URL

Tove Faber Frandsen. Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles. Learned Publishing, 1-7, 2022. [PUMA: author bibliometrics bibliometrie experience journals predatory publications scientific scopus] URL

Jonathan P. Tennant, Harry Crane, Tom Crick, Jacinto Davila, Asura Enkhbayar, Johanna Havemann, Bianca Kramer, Ryan Martin, Paola Masuzzo, Andy Nobes, Curt Rice, Bárbara Rivera-López, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Susanne Sattler, Paul D. Thacker, and Marc Vanholsbeeck. Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing. Publications, (7)2:34, MDPI AG, May 2019. [PUMA: Scopus access communication copyright evaluation factor impact oa of open peer publizieren research review scholarly science web wissenschaftliches] URL

Dalmeet Singh Chawla. Hundreds of `predatory' journals indexed on leading scholarly database. Nature, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, February 2021. [PUMA: access journals oa open predatory publications scopus] URL

Philippe Mongeon, and Adèle Paul-Hus. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, (106)1:213--228, Jan 1, 2016. [PUMA: analyse bibliometrie metriken of science scopus szientometrie unibibliografie vergleich web wos] URL

Éric Archambault, David Campbell, Yves Gingras, and Vincent Larivière. Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, (60)7:1320 - 1326, 2009. [PUMA: bibliometrie scopus wos] URL

Rafael Ball, and Dirk Tunger. Science indicators revisited - Science Citation Index versus SCOPUS: A bibliometric comparison of both citation databases.. Information Services & Use, (26)4:293 - 301, 2006. [PUMA: bibliometrie scopus wos] URL