Publications

Roberto Di Cosmo, and Stefano Zacchiroli. Software Heritage: Why and How to Preserve Software Source Code. iPRES 2017 - 14th International Conference on Digital Preservation, 1-10, Kyoto, Japan, September 2017. [PUMA: forschungsdaten repository software] URL

Michael Bar-Sinai, and Matthew Dunlap. The Open Monolith - Keeping Your Codebase (and Your Headaches) Small. In JavaOne (Eds.), 2017. [PUMA: dataverse development forschungsdaten repository software workflows]

Jochen Schirrwagen, Philipp Cimiano, Vidya Ayer, Christian Pietsch, Cord Wiljes, Johanna Vompras, and Dirk Pieper. Expanding the Research Data Management Service Portfolio at Bielefeld University According to the Three-pillar Principle Towards Data FAIRness. Data Science Journal, (18)12019. [PUMA: fairPrinciples forschungsdaten infrastruktur repository versionierung] URL

Thomas Bein, Leni Helmes, Bernhard Neumair, Uwe Rosemann, and Ludger Wessjohann. RADAR Abschlussbericht. October 2016. [PUMA: forschungsdaten repository] URL

Angelina Kraft, Matthias Razum, Jan Potthoff, Andrea Porzel, Thomas Engel, Frank Lange, Karina van den Broek, and Filipe Furtado. The RADAR Project - A Service for Research Data Archival and Publication.. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, (5)3:28, 2016. [PUMA: forschungsdaten repository] URL

Michael Diepenbroek, Hannes Grobe, Manfred Reinke, Uwe Schindler, Reiner Schlitzer, Rainer Sieger, and Gerold Wefer. PANGAEA - an information system for environmental sciences. Computers & Geosciences, (28)10:1201--1210, Elsevier BV, December 2002. [PUMA: forschungsdaten litPHBFD repository] URL

Heinz Pampel, Paul Vierkant, Frank Scholze, Roland Bertelmann, Maxi Kindling, Jens Klump, Hans-Jürgen Goebelbecker, Jens Gundlach, Peter Schirmbacher, and Uwe Dierolf. Making Research Data Repositories Visible: The re3data.org Registry. PLOS ONE, (8)11:1-10, Public Library of Science, November 2013. [PUMA: forschungsdaten repository] URL

Richard Grunzke, Volker Hartmann, Thomas Jejkal, Helen Kollai, Ajinkya Prabhune, Hendrik Herold, Aline Deicke, Christiane Dressler, Julia Dolhoff, Julia Stanek, Alexander Hoffmann, Ralph Müller-Pfefferkorn, Torsten Schrade, Gotthard Meinel, Sonja Herres-Pawlis, and Wolfgang E. Nagel. The MASi repository service — Comprehensive, metadata-driven and multi-community research data management. Future Generation Computer Systems, (94):879 - 894, 2019. [PUMA: forschungsdaten litPHBFD metadata repository tools] URL

Steve Kaminski, and Olaf Brandt. Das institutionelle Forschungsdatenrepositorium FDAT der Universität Tübingen. o-bib. Das offene Bibliotheksjournal / herausgegeben vom VDB, (5)3:61-75, o-bib. Das offene Bibliotheksjournal / herausgegeben vom VDB, 2018. [PUMA: forschungsdaten repository] URL

Jochen Apel, Fabian Gebhart, Leonhard Maylein, and Martin Wlotzka. Offene Forschungsdaten an der Universität Heidelberg: von generischen institutionellen Repositorien zu fach- und projektspezifischen Diensten. O-Bib. Das Offene Bibliotheksjournal / Herausgeber VDB, (5)2:61-71, 2018. [PUMA: forschungsdaten repository] URL

Dimitris Rousidis, Miguel-Ángel Sicilia, Emmanouel Garoufallou, and Panos Balatsoukas. Data Quality Issues and Content Analysis for Research Data Repositories : The Case of Dryad.. In Panayiota Polydoratou, and Milena Dobreva (Eds.), ELPUB, 49-58, IOS Press, 2014. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata quality repo repository] URL

Jung-Ran Park, and Yuji Tosaka. Metadata Quality Control in Digital Repositories and Collections: Criteria, Semantics, and Mechanisms. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, (48)8:696-715, Routledge, 2010. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata quality repository survey] URL

Ayla Stein, Kelly J. Applegate, and Seth Robbins. Achieving and Maintaining Metadata Quality: Toward a Sustainable Workflow for the IDEALS Institutional Repository. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, (55)7-8:644-666, Routledge, 2017. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata quality repository] URL

Jung-Ran Park. Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories: A Survey of the Current State of the Art. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, (47)3-4:213-228, Routledge, 2009. [PUMA: forschungsdaten imported metadata quality repository survey] URL

Sebastian Neumaier, Jürgen Umbrich, and Axel Polleres. Automated quality assessment of metadata across open data portals. Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ), (8)1:2, ACM, 2016. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata quality repository]

Martin Fenner, Mercè Crosas, Jeffrey S Grethe, David Kennedy, Henning Hermjakob, Phillippe Rocca-Serra, Gustavo Durand, Robin Berjon, Sebastian Karcher, Maryann Martone, and others. A data citation roadmap for scholarly data repositories. Scientific data, (6)Nature Publishing Group, 2019. [PUMA: citation forschungsdaten repository]

Dennis Wehrle, Bernd Wiebelt, and Dirk von Suchodoletz. Design eines FDM-fähigen Speichersystems.. In Paul Müller, Bernhard Neumair, Helmut Reiser, and Gabi Dreo Rodosek (Eds.), DFN-Forum Kommunikationstechnologien, (P-271):115-124, GI, 2017. [PUMA: forschungsdaten repository storage] URL

Björn Selent, Hamzeh Kraus, Niels Hansen, Björn Schembera, Anett Seeland, and Dorothea Iglezakis. Management of Research Data in Computational Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics. In Vincent Heuveline, Fabian Gebhart, and Nina Mohammadianbisheh (Eds.), E-Science-Tage 2019: Data to Knowledge, 128-139, HeiBOOKS, Heidelberg, 2020. [PUMA: aerodynamics engineering forschungsdaten metadata myown project_dipling repository thermodynamics]

Paul Baumann, Philipp Krahn, and Anne Lauber-Rönsberg. FAQs für Betreiber von Forschungsdatenrepositorien. 2019. [PUMA: forschungsdaten lizenz repository urheberrecht] URL

Pierre Tremouilhac, Chia-Lin Lin, Pei-Chi Huang, Yu-Chieh Huang, An Nguyen, Nicole Jung, Felix Bach, Robert Ulrich, Bernhard Neumair, Achim Streit, and Stefan Bräse. The Repository Chemotion: Infrastructure for Sustainable Research in Chemistry. April 2020. [PUMA: chemie forschungsdaten repository tools] URL