Quality assessment for linked data: A survey. Semantic Web, (7)1:63--93, IOS Press, 2016. [PUMA: metadata linkedData quality]
Test-driven evaluation of linked data quality. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, 747–758, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2014. [PUMA: metadata linkedData quality] URL
Open Government Data: Usage trends and metadata quality. Journal of Information Science, (49)4:887-910, 2023. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata governmentalData usage openData quality] URL
Dataset search in biodiversity research: Do metadata in data repositories reflect scholarly information needs?. PLOS ONE, (16)3:1-36, Public Library of Science, March 2021. [PUMA: forschungsdaten biodiversity metadata retrievability quality] URL
Automated Quality Assessment of Metadata across Open Data Portals. J. Data and Information Quality, (8)1Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, October 2016. [PUMA: forschungsdaten opendata metadata metrics quality] URL
Implementation of Metadata Quality Metrics and Application on Public Government Data. 2013 IEEE 37th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops, 236-241, 2013. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata metrics quality]
Do researchers use open research data? Exploring the relationships between usage trends and metadata quality across scientific disciplines from the Figshare case. Journal of Information Science, (48)4:423-448, 2022. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata usage quality] URL
Facilitating harmonized data quality assessments. A data quality framework for observational health research data collections with software implementations in R. BMC Medical Research Methodology, (21)1:63--, 2021. [PUMA: framework forschungsdaten health quality] URL
Quality of Metadata in Open Data Portals. IEEE Access, (9):60364-60382, 2021. [PUMA: opendata metadata quality]
Curated Archiving of Research Software Artifacts: Lessons Learned from the French Open Archive (HAL). International Journal of Digital Curation, (15)1:16, Edinburgh University Library, August 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten software curation quality repository] URL
Curated Archiving of Research Software Artifacts: Lessons Learned from the French Open Archive (HAL). International Journal of Digital Curation, (15)1:16, Edinburgh University Library, August 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten software curation quality repository from:diglezakis] URL
Detecting Quality Problems in Research Data: A Model-Driven Approach. 2020. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata quality] URL
Accountable Data Analytics Start with Accountable Data: The LiQuID Metadata Model. 2020. [PUMA: metadata rechtlicheFragestellungen ethischeFragestellungen quality]
The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defning, Expression, Exploiting. (Metadata in Practice)ALA Editions, 2004. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata quality]
The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era. Data Science Journal, (14)0:2, Ubiquity Press, Ltd., May 2015. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata quality] URL
Herausforderung Datenqualität - Empfehlungen zur Zukunftsfähigkeit von Forschung im digitalen Wandel. In RfII (Eds.), 172 S., Göttingen, 2019. [PUMA: forschungsdaten quality] URL
A method for examining metadata quality in open research datasets using the OAI-PMH and SQL queries: the case of the Dublin Core 'Subject' element and suggestions for user-centred metadata annotation design.. IJMSO, (13)1:1-8, 2018. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata quality] URL
Automated quality assessment of metadata across open data portals. Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ), (8)1:2, ACM, 2016. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata quality repository]
Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories: A Survey of the Current State of the Art. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, (47)3-4:213-228, Routledge, 2009. [PUMA: imported forschungsdaten metadata survey quality repository] URL
Achieving and Maintaining Metadata Quality: Toward a Sustainable Workflow for the IDEALS Institutional Repository. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, (55)7-8:644-666, Routledge, 2017. [PUMA: forschungsdaten metadata quality repository] URL