{ "types" : { "Bookmark" : { "pluralLabel" : "Bookmarks" }, "Publication" : { "pluralLabel" : "Publications" }, "GoldStandardPublication" : { "pluralLabel" : "GoldStandardPublications" }, "GoldStandardBookmark" : { "pluralLabel" : "GoldStandardBookmarks" }, "Tag" : { "pluralLabel" : "Tags" }, "User" : { "pluralLabel" : "Users" }, "Group" : { "pluralLabel" : "Groups" }, "Sphere" : { "pluralLabel" : "Spheres" } }, "properties" : { "count" : { "valueType" : "number" }, "date" : { "valueType" : "date" }, "changeDate" : { "valueType" : "date" }, "url" : { "valueType" : "url" }, "id" : { "valueType" : "url" }, "tags" : { "valueType" : "item" }, "user" : { "valueType" : "item" } }, "items" : [ { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2516819f6c13a03162c92b434e71ac49a/robertadibari", "tags" : [ "lca","peer","rp18" ], "intraHash" : "516819f6c13a03162c92b434e71ac49a", "interHash" : "5617a802af1a8e659487baf3f583f051", "label" : "Vulnerability assessment and lifecycle analysis of an existing masonry arch bridge", "user" : "robertadibari", "description" : "", "date" : "2024-01-11 11:15:39", "changeDate" : "2024-01-11 11:17:06", "count" : 3, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "Engineering Structures", "year": "2024", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117422", "author": [ "Raffaele Cucuzza","Angelo Aloisio","Roberta Di Bari","Marco Domaneschi" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Raffaele", "last" : "Cucuzza"}, {"first" : "Angelo", "last" : "Aloisio"}, {"first" : "Roberta", "last" : "Di Bari"}, {"first" : "Marco", "last" : "Domaneschi"} ], "doi" : "10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117422", "bibtexKey": "cucuzza2024vulnerability" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2c1c1541c6ed8895ac775c5d49ac219ad/robertadibari", "tags" : [ "lca","myown","peer","rp18","timber" ], "intraHash" : "c1c1541c6ed8895ac775c5d49ac219ad", "interHash" : "06e5969f09fc19a5d55a3ffbe77547cb", "label" : "Environmental Impact of a Mono-Material Timber Building Envelope with Enhanced Energy Performance", "user" : "robertadibari", "description" : "", "date" : "2023-10-16 16:22:20", "changeDate" : "2023-10-16 16:22:20", "count" : 4, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "Sustainability","publisher":"MDPI", "year": "2023", "url": "", "author": [ "Oliver Bucklin","Roberta Di Bari","Felix Amtsberg","Achim Menges" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Oliver", "last" : "Bucklin"}, {"first" : "Roberta", "last" : "Di Bari"}, {"first" : "Felix", "last" : "Amtsberg"}, {"first" : "Achim", "last" : "Menges"} ], "volume": "15","number": "1","pages": "556", "language" : "eng", "issn" : "2071-1050", "doi" : "10.3390/su15010556", "bibtexKey": "bucklin2023environmental" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2cde495194f220252ea635db9971770dc/robertadibari", "tags" : [ "buildings","digitalization","lca","myown","peer","rp18","tools" ], "intraHash" : "cde495194f220252ea635db9971770dc", "interHash" : "42c46633c3fa0ff5231561cbdc4df378", "label" : "Buildings LCA and digitalization: Designers' toolbox based on a survey", "user" : "robertadibari", "description" : "", "date" : "2023-10-16 16:08:40", "changeDate" : "2023-10-16 16:20:25", "count" : 1, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science","publisher":"IOP Publishing","address":"[Place of publication not identified]", "year": "2022", "url": "https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1078/1/012092", "author": [ "Roberta Di Bari","Rafael Horn","Simone Bruhn","Nicolas Alaux","Marcella Ruschi Mendes Saade","Bernedette Soust-Verdaguer","Tajda Potrč Obrecht","Alexander Hollberg","Harpa Birgisdottír","Alexander Passer","Rolf Frischknech" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Roberta", "last" : "Di Bari"}, {"first" : "Rafael", "last" : "Horn"}, {"first" : "Simone", "last" : "Bruhn"}, {"first" : "Nicolas", "last" : "Alaux"}, {"first" : "Marcella", "last" : "Ruschi Mendes Saade"}, {"first" : "Bernedette", "last" : "Soust-Verdaguer"}, {"first" : "Tajda", "last" : "Potrč Obrecht"}, {"first" : "Alexander", "last" : "Hollberg"}, {"first" : "Harpa", "last" : "Birgisdottír"}, {"first" : "Alexander", "last" : "Passer"}, {"first" : "Rolf", "last" : "Frischknech"} ], "volume": "1078","number": "1","pages": "012092","abstract": "In a context of digitalization and increasing quality requirements, the building sector is facing an increasing level of complexity regarding its design process. This results in a growing number of involved actors from different domains, a multitude of tasks to be completed and a higher degree of needed expertise. New buildings are also required to reach higher performances in terms of environmental quality. To that regard, the exploitation of the full potential of digital tools can facilitate the integration of environmental aspects in the planning process, limit productivity shortcomings and reduce environmental impacts, which can result from an unaware decision making. Building environmental assessment can be performed through several Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)-based tools. \"Pure calculation\" tools quantify final buildings' environmental potential, while \"complex tools\" additionally support decision making during the planning process. It is often difficult to choose the best suitable tool, which strongly depends on the user's needs. Within the IEA EBC Annex 72, a survey was realized with the main objective of creating a comprehensive overview of the existing tools dedicated to buildings LCA. The questionnaire included the usability, functionality, compliance, data reliability and interoperability of the analysed tools. Lastly, based on the survey outcomes and their critical assessment, a procedure for the identification and selection of a tool has been proposed based on user's needs. As a result, this work outlines main features of currently available building LCA tools, for which there is a harmonized status in terms of usability and overall applied LCA methodology. Despite the need for more automatized workflows, tools' embedding is mostly not yet applicable in system chains or limited to a restricted number of tools.", "refid" : "859299227", "doi" : "10.1088/1755-1315/1078/1/012092", "bibtexKey": "bari2022buildings" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2eb4d5401d82059e2a90a160002207fcd/robertadibari", "tags" : [ "Gebäudehülle","Leichtbaukonstruktionen","lca","peer","rp18","uncertainties" ], "intraHash" : "eb4d5401d82059e2a90a160002207fcd", "interHash" : "78851c099f436caa82599ab21d3fb2ae", "label" : "Bauphysikalische und ökologische Bewertung adaptiver Fassadenkonstruktionen auf Raumebene", "user" : "robertadibari", "description" : "", "date" : "2020-09-15 13:13:04", "changeDate" : "2020-09-15 11:13:04", "count" : 7, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "Bauphysik", "year": "2019", "url": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bapi.201900023", "author": [ "Nadine Harder","Friederike Schlegl","Daniela Flemming","Roberta Di Bari","Stefan Albrecht","Philip Leistner","Sumee Park" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Nadine", "last" : "Harder"}, {"first" : "Friederike", "last" : "Schlegl"}, {"first" : "Daniela", "last" : "Flemming"}, {"first" : "Roberta", "last" : "Di Bari"}, {"first" : "Stefan", "last" : "Albrecht"}, {"first" : "Philip", "last" : "Leistner"}, {"first" : "Sumee", "last" : "Park"} ], "volume": "41","number": "6","pages": "302--313","abstract": "Assessment of building physics and environmental potentials of adaptive facade constructions on room level. Lightweight and at the same time adaptive solutions for building shells and structures are a potential answer to the high and increasing use of resources in the construction industry. To live up to this expectations, adaptive solutions need to provide damagefree buildings with appropriate quality of living as well as significantly higher resource efficiency. Both criteria apply to the entire life cycle and need to include the additional operating energy required for adaptivity. In a previous study on adaptive lightweight constructions for facades, the physical functionality and environmental impact of some use cases were discussed at component level. In the present article, the horizon is extended to the room level. This\r\nextension enables the inclusion of characteristic values for thermal and moisture protection of the shell as well as the comfort in the room as evaluation indicators. This increases the required effort and complexity of the assessment, but the application potential of adaptive alternatives can be assessed more thoroughly and thus the information quality for decision-making on the further utilization is improved. In the study three conventional constructions, partly massive and partly lightweight constructions, as well as equivalent adaptive facades, are considered and assessed\r\non room level. The essential evaluation criteria are quantitative statements on the fulfillment of building physics requirements and on environmental impacts. The results of the applied inter-methodological research indicate a great potential for reducing\r\nresources without restricting functionality by adaptive constructions. However the results strongly depend on the specific external conditions, e.g. location.", "language" : "deutsch", "doi" : "10.1002/bapi.201900023", "bibtexKey": "harder2019bauphysikalische" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/25d72eba61d98728f544833dd62262b8c/robertadibari", "tags" : [ "Building","LCA","peer","renovation","rp18","uncertainties" ], "intraHash" : "5d72eba61d98728f544833dd62262b8c", "interHash" : "28888d7582ea32e85b62d8b585cf6677", "label" : "Analysing the impact of retrofitting and new construction through probabilistic life cycle assessment. A method applied to the environmental-economic payoff value of an intervention case in the Albanian building sector", "user" : "robertadibari", "description" : "", "date" : "2020-09-15 12:50:05", "changeDate" : "2020-09-15 10:50:05", "count" : 2, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science", "year": "2019", "url": "https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012184", "author": [ "Olivia Jorgji","Roberta Di Bari","Lenz Katrin","Johannes Gantner","Rafael Horn" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Olivia", "last" : "Jorgji"}, {"first" : "Roberta", "last" : "Di Bari"}, {"first" : "Lenz", "last" : "Katrin"}, {"first" : "Johannes", "last" : "Gantner"}, {"first" : "Rafael", "last" : "Horn"} ], "volume": "323","number": "012184","abstract": "The EU building stock is relatively old with 40% of it built before 1960. In Albania the building sector accounts for 26, 9% of final energy consumption, offering high energy saving potentials due to the great number of old residential buildings. Intervention is not always possible and, in order to achieve significant environmental savings, the national action plans cannot rely only on the physical improvement of existing buildings. This paper proposes a probabilistic LCA and LCC evaluation model using MC simulation, for the prediction of intervention options in existing buildings. The potential environmental and economic impacts of three intervention options: standard, ambitious retrofitting and new construction during the whole life cycle of a building are analysed. A framework is defined, with the purpose of estimating the value of a building in a specific time during its life cycle. Comparing the generated values of potential environmental impacts and associating them with the changes on the buildings value enables the process of deciding upon the most desirable and/or agreed combination. The results of the SLED Study 2015 on Albanian building typology are used, while the new construction model is defined according to German EnEV2014 requirements. The GWP values from the LCA/LCC assessment of the intervention scenarios, done through the SBS tool of Fraunhofer IBP, are used to create a prediction model for future alternative solutions especially in early planning phase. Decision-making through this model can encourage a sustainability strategy for energy efficiency improvement in the building sector of Albania.", "language" : "english", "doi" : "10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012184", "bibtexKey": "jorgji2019analysing" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2b76d66f081b3be06fed1ebf83e113d5e/robertadibari", "tags" : [ "bim","lca","peer","rp","rp18","uncertainties" ], "intraHash" : "b76d66f081b3be06fed1ebf83e113d5e", "interHash" : "eb5414cace846f7935b9619cbc436240", "label" : "Step-by-step implementation of BIM-LCA: A case study analysis associating defined construction phases with their respective environmental impacts", "user" : "robertadibari", "description" : "", "date" : "2020-09-15 12:46:45", "changeDate" : "2020-09-15 10:46:45", "count" : 3, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science", "year": "2019", "url": "", "author": [ "Roberta Di Bari","Olivia Jorgji","Rafael Horn","Johannes Gantner","Sebastian Ebertshäuser" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Roberta", "last" : "Di Bari"}, {"first" : "Olivia", "last" : "Jorgji"}, {"first" : "Rafael", "last" : "Horn"}, {"first" : "Johannes", "last" : "Gantner"}, {"first" : "Sebastian", "last" : "Ebertshäuser"} ], "volume": "323","number": "012105","abstract": "Building Information Modelling (BIM) supports construction processes by dealing\r\nwith the variety and complexity of design in a single virtual model. The model may also be complemented by the static and energy performance of buildings. Facing the growing demand of sustainability strategies in the construction sector, the consideration of environmental information within the planning process influences the decision making of planners and\r\nstakeholders. Nevertheless, the life cycle assessment of buildings has been so far excluded in BIM, due to the high variety of accurate information and time required. In this paper, a systematic framework is presented and applied to a case study. BIM-LCA assists actors along the planning and designing phase, from the building conception as a whole, up to the elements' details and materials' definition. BIM and LCA intertwine in an application scheme of seven phases for integral planning and four levels of structural composition of a building. With respect to these, involved actors examine potential solutions through a tool which exploits alternative\r\nspecifications in order to assess the environmental impacts. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the application of a BIM-LCA model regarding decision making for reliable values of environmental impact in a given structural level of the building. The main findings of this framework are due to the multitude of actors and information orchestrated, namely to uncertainties which characterize the whole planning process and data handling. Through BIMLCA, actors are assisted by ensuring flexibility of models and consistency of results throughout planning and designing.", "doi" : "10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012105", "bibtexKey": "dibari2019stepbystep" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2de3b5e6132a9a380205b3da4ea9547a2/robertadibari", "tags" : [ "BIM","LCA","peer","rp18" ], "intraHash" : "de3b5e6132a9a380205b3da4ea9547a2", "interHash" : "a08fe5c9fdbd1514907692a7436aac61", "label" : "BIM2LCA Approach: An Industry Foundation Classes (IFC)-Based Interface to Integrate Life Cycle Assessment in Integral Planning", "user" : "robertadibari", "description" : "", "date" : "2020-09-15 12:40:43", "changeDate" : "2020-09-15 10:40:43", "count" : 2, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "Sustainability", "year": "2020", "url": "https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6558", "author": [ "Rafael Horn","Sebastian Ebertshäuser","Roberta Di Bari","Olivia Jorgji","René Traunspurger","Petra von Both" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Rafael", "last" : "Horn"}, {"first" : "Sebastian", "last" : "Ebertshäuser"}, {"first" : "Roberta", "last" : "Di Bari"}, {"first" : "Olivia", "last" : "Jorgji"}, {"first" : "René", "last" : "Traunspurger"}, {"first" : "Petra von", "last" : "Both"} ], "volume": "12","number": "16","pages": "6558","abstract": "An increasing degree of digitalization in construction planning offers significant potential for building life cycle assessment (LCA) to reduce access barriers, as well as the assessment effort itself. To realize the widespread application of LCA tools and their potential to effectively minimize life cycle impacts, an open approach is required that allows for flexible application of comprehensive LCA studies and early integration in planning processes. The authors present an approach for LCA integration in all phases of digital planning which aims at a DGNB (Deutsche Gesellschaft für nachhaltiges Bauen) certification based on the open Building Information Modeling (BIM) standard Industry Foundation Classes (IFC). The approach takes into account varying levels of development and resulting data availability during integral planning phases, as well as resulting LCA application contexts. It goes beyond existing strategies and allows one to consider both BIM and LCA software through a workflow based on a single data format. The assessment framework is operationalized through standardized interface development and technical realization following the information delivery manual (IDM) process standardized for IFC interfaces. The Extensible Markup Language (XML) schema, as a specific implementation for certification, provides the target system for LCA data requirements and is generalized to a planning phase specific IDM base table. The technical realization based on respective model view definitions and distributed data suggests a pathway to the standardization of LCA-IFC integration based on an open approach. The overall approach exemplarily applies to the \u201CLERNZENTRUM\u201D at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) campus. We conclude that an open BIM approach for LCA integration in model-based planning is feasible, but requires several adjustments in IFC, LCA, and planning practice. Adding a lifecycle element to the IFC to connect BIM and LCA provides comprehensive feedback for informed decision making based on environmental impact.", "language" : "english", "doi" : "10.3390/su12166558", "bibtexKey": "horn2020bim2lca" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2c2166a4b7fde7d605bd86cd5220c80ad/robertadibari", "tags" : [ "LCA","RP18","hazard","peer","retrofit","seismic","uncertainties" ], "intraHash" : "c2166a4b7fde7d605bd86cd5220c80ad", "interHash" : "1e3403499f3a318e75a7f5b4c97c5a1b", "label" : "Probabilistic Life-Cycle Assessment of Service Life Extension on Renovated Buildings under Seismic Hazard", "user" : "robertadibari", "description" : "", "date" : "2020-09-15 11:34:58", "changeDate" : "2020-09-15 11:15:14", "count" : 4, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "Buildings", "year": "2020", "url": "https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/10/3/48/htm", "author": [ "Roberta Di Bari","Andrea Belleri","Alessandra Marini","Rafael Horn","Johannes Gantner" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Roberta", "last" : "Di Bari"}, {"first" : "Andrea", "last" : "Belleri"}, {"first" : "Alessandra", "last" : "Marini"}, {"first" : "Rafael", "last" : "Horn"}, {"first" : "Johannes", "last" : "Gantner"} ], "volume": "10","number": "3","pages": "48","abstract": "Existing buildings can reach a performance enhancement and extend their nominal service life through renovation measures such as seismic rehabilitation. In particular, when buildings have almost exhausted their service life, seeking an optimal solution should consider whether costs and environmental effects are worthwhile, or new construction is preferred. In this paper, a methodology to consider seismic hazard into probabilistic approaches for life-cycle analyses is presented considering the possibility of structural enhancement over an extended building lifespan. A life-cycle-based decision support tool for building renovation measures is developed and applied to a selected case study. Unlike standard \u201Cstatic\u201D analyses, which in this work show shortcomings by underestimating impacts of vulnerable buildings, such an approach brings out environmental and economic advantages of retrofit measures designed to improve the structural performance.", "language" : "english", "doi" : "10.3390/buildings10030048", "bibtexKey": "noauthororeditor2020probabilistic" } ] }