{ "types" : { "Bookmark" : { "pluralLabel" : "Bookmarks" }, "Publication" : { "pluralLabel" : "Publications" }, "GoldStandardPublication" : { "pluralLabel" : "GoldStandardPublications" }, "GoldStandardBookmark" : { "pluralLabel" : "GoldStandardBookmarks" }, "Tag" : { "pluralLabel" : "Tags" }, "User" : { "pluralLabel" : "Users" }, "Group" : { "pluralLabel" : "Groups" }, "Sphere" : { "pluralLabel" : "Spheres" } }, "properties" : { "count" : { "valueType" : "number" }, "date" : { "valueType" : "date" }, "changeDate" : { "valueType" : "date" }, "url" : { "valueType" : "url" }, "id" : { "valueType" : "url" }, "tags" : { "valueType" : "item" }, "user" : { "valueType" : "item" } }, "items" : [ { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2930bdabbba7f1e0016ebc2335eb21a3c/droessler", "tags" : [ "access","agreements","mpdl","open","transformation","transformative" ], "intraHash" : "930bdabbba7f1e0016ebc2335eb21a3c", "interHash" : "15e91fa296397a7f93b9e006ecbe8785", "label" : "Transformative agreements: Six myths, busted: Lessons learned", "user" : "droessler", "description" : "", "date" : "2025-04-28 00:57:52", "changeDate" : "2025-04-28 00:57:52", "count" : 1, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "College & Research Libraries News","publisher":"American Library Association", "year": "2021", "url": "http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crln.82.7.298", "author": [ "Ashley Farley","Allison Langham-Putrow","Elisabeth Shook","Leila Sterman","Megan Wacha" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Ashley", "last" : "Farley"}, {"first" : "Allison", "last" : "Langham-Putrow"}, {"first" : "Elisabeth", "last" : "Shook"}, {"first" : "Leila", "last" : "Sterman"}, {"first" : "Megan", "last" : "Wacha"} ], "volume": "82","number": "7","pages": "298","abstract": "Transformative agreement (TA) is an umbrella term used to describe contracts between institutions and publishers intended to transform the current, primarily subscription-based, journal publishing model to a fully open access (OA) model. The idea originated in a 2015 white paper from the Max Planck Digital Library (MPDL), which posited that the current level of investment ($10 billion worldwide) is sufficient to fund the transformation to OA within existing publishing structures: a system in which 60% of the market is controlled by five publishers who maintain excessive profit margins.", "issn" : "0099-0086", "doi" : "10.5860/crln.82.7.298", "bibtexKey": "farley2021transformative" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2bfb36edb406a5fba3090edf68380caba/droessler", "tags" : [ "access","agreements","open","transformation","transformative" ], "intraHash" : "bfb36edb406a5fba3090edf68380caba", "interHash" : "726f89934d825ad188aa72d4ccd2bf35", "label" : "Uncensored Scholarly Communication Fragments", "user" : "droessler", "description" : "", "date" : "2025-04-28 00:56:17", "changeDate" : "2025-04-28 00:56:17", "count" : 1, "pub-type": "article", "publisher":"unknown", "year": "2020", "url": "https://works.hcommons.org/doi/10.17613/4mzex-g4460", "author": [ "Dave Ghamandi" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Dave", "last" : "Ghamandi"} ], "copyright" : "Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International", "language" : "en", "doi" : "10.17613/4MZEX-G4460", "bibtexKey": "ghamandi2020uncensored" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2c5e8bb85e0b8f52d338419a70b56c907/droessler", "tags" : [ "access","analysis","coalition","journals","open","plan","s","transformation","transformative" ], "intraHash" : "c5e8bb85e0b8f52d338419a70b56c907", "interHash" : "098467393ecbc2e453694d0050627d6e", "label" : "Transformative Journals: analysis from the 2023 reports", "user" : "droessler", "description" : "", "date" : "2025-04-28 00:54:49", "changeDate" : "2025-04-28 00:54:49", "count" : 1, "pub-type": "electronic", "year": "2024", "url": "https://www.coalition-s.org/blog/transformative-journals-analysis-from-the-2023-reports/", "author": [ "Robert Kiley" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Robert", "last" : "Kiley"} ], "language" : "en", "bibtexKey": "kiley2024transformative" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/21c8df6d03537e789f9b39a176c29c4ad/droessler", "tags" : [ "access","agreements","big","communications","crisis","deals","imperialism","open","prestige","publishing","scholarly","serials","transformative" ], "intraHash" : "1c8df6d03537e789f9b39a176c29c4ad", "interHash" : "01ff0b7b4096ec2154cd85c77f5550ba", "label" : "Message from the Grassroots: Scholarly Communication, Crisis, and Contradictions", "user" : "droessler", "description" : "", "date" : "2025-04-28 00:51:47", "changeDate" : "2025-04-28 00:51:47", "count" : 1, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship","publisher":"University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL", "year": "2021", "url": "http://dx.doi.org/10.33137/cjalrcbu.v7.36448", "author": [ "Camille Noûs" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Camille", "last" : "Noûs"} ], "volume": "7","pages": "1\u201327","abstract": "Librarians have responded to the decades-long \u201Cserials crisis\u201D with a common narrative and a range of responses that have failed to challenge the ideology and structures that caused it. Using Walter Rodney\u2019s theory of a guerilla intellectual, we critically examine the dominant understanding of this so-called crisis and emphasize the role that capital plays within it. The imperial nature of scholarly journal publishing and some of its many contradictions are discussed. \u201CTransformative\u201D agreements receive special attention as a hyper-capitalist manifestation of these contradictions at the heart of commercial publishing.The politics of refusal are one response to the commercialism, prestige, and power imbalances that drive the academic publishing system. Highlighting the differences between refusal and reform, this paper explores the protagonistic role that librarians can play in a protracted struggle within and beyond the confines of our profession. Select open access efforts are identified at the end as examples of different forms of refusal. This paper is intended to move beyond the traditional discourse of laying blame solely at the feet of the academic publishing oligopoly and also expounds on the bourgeois academy\u2019s use of knowledge production for capital accumulation.", "issn" : "2369-937X", "doi" : "10.33137/cjalrcbu.v7.36448", "bibtexKey": "nous2021message" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2d99448cb44153e2b3a428714d0022281/droessler", "tags" : [ "access","agreements","costs","finance","finanzierung","open","transformation","transformative" ], "intraHash" : "d99448cb44153e2b3a428714d0022281", "interHash" : "7d9cab640499ce2b7aeee228b4d53fb8", "label" : "The 'Must Stock' Challenge in Academic Publishing: Pricing Implications of Transformative Agreements", "user" : "droessler", "description" : "", "date" : "2024-04-17 11:12:28", "changeDate" : "2024-04-17 11:12:28", "count" : 1, "pub-type": "misc", "year": "2024", "url": "", "author": [ "W. Benedikt Schmal" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "W. Benedikt", "last" : "Schmal"} ], "eprint" : "2403.03597", "archiveprefix" : "arXiv", "primaryclass" : "econ.GN", "bibtexKey": "schmal2024must" } ] }