{ "types" : { "Bookmark" : { "pluralLabel" : "Bookmarks" }, "Publication" : { "pluralLabel" : "Publications" }, "GoldStandardPublication" : { "pluralLabel" : "GoldStandardPublications" }, "GoldStandardBookmark" : { "pluralLabel" : "GoldStandardBookmarks" }, "Tag" : { "pluralLabel" : "Tags" }, "User" : { "pluralLabel" : "Users" }, "Group" : { "pluralLabel" : "Groups" }, "Sphere" : { "pluralLabel" : "Spheres" } }, "properties" : { "count" : { "valueType" : "number" }, "date" : { "valueType" : "date" }, "changeDate" : { "valueType" : "date" }, "url" : { "valueType" : "url" }, "id" : { "valueType" : "url" }, "tags" : { "valueType" : "item" }, "user" : { "valueType" : "item" } }, "items" : [ { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2576f17fdcd32ebb4f299bd7e6676075b/droessler", "tags" : [ "access","apc","article","charges","oligopoly","open","processing","publisher","publishing" ], "intraHash" : "576f17fdcd32ebb4f299bd7e6676075b", "interHash" : "3397868ab7c24802e703c5d12230cf93", "label" : "The oligopoly\u2019s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges", "user" : "droessler", "description" : "", "date" : "2024-10-31 20:20:25", "changeDate" : "2024-10-31 20:20:25", "count" : 1, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "Quantitative Science Studies", "year": "2023", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00272", "author": [ "Leigh-Ann Butler","Lisa Matthias","Marc-André Simard","Philippe Mongeon","Stefanie Haustein" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Leigh-Ann", "last" : "Butler"}, {"first" : "Lisa", "last" : "Matthias"}, {"first" : "Marc-André", "last" : "Simard"}, {"first" : "Philippe", "last" : "Mongeon"}, {"first" : "Stefanie", "last" : "Haustein"} ], "volume": "4","number": "4","pages": "778--799","abstract": "We aim to estimate the total amount of article processing charges (APCs) paid to publish open access (OA) in journals controlled by the five large commercial publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley) between 2015 and 2018. Using publication data from WoS, OA status from Unpaywall, and annual APC prices from open data sets and historical fees retrieved via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, we estimate that globally authors paid $1.06 billion in publication fees to these publishers from 2015\u20132018. Revenue from gold OA amounted to $612.5 million, and $448.3 million was obtained for publishing OA in hybrid journals. Among the five publishers, Springer Nature made the most revenue from OA ($589.7 million), followed by Elsevier ($221.4 million), Wiley ($114.3 million), Taylor & Francis ($76.8 million), and Sage ($31.6 million). With Elsevier and Wiley making most of their APC revenue from hybrid fees and others focusing on gold, different OA strategies could be observed between publishers.", "issn" : "26413337", "doi" : "10.1162/qss_a_00272", "bibtexKey": "butler2023oligopolys" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69/open-access", "tags" : [ "access","kosten","article","scholarly","apc","journal","charges","processing","publishing","open","studie","from:droessler" ], "intraHash" : "fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69", "interHash" : "6c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187", "label" : "Open access article processing charges 2011 - 2021", "user" : "open-access", "description" : "", "date" : "2021-12-07 20:53:54", "changeDate" : "2021-12-07 19:53:54", "count" : 2, "pub-type": "preprint", "year": "2021", "url": "http://hdl.handle.net/10393/42327", "author": [ "Heather Morrison","Luan Borges","Xuan Zhao","Tanoh Laurent Kakou","Amit Nataraj Shanbhoug" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Heather", "last" : "Morrison"}, {"first" : "Luan", "last" : "Borges"}, {"first" : "Xuan", "last" : "Zhao"}, {"first" : "Tanoh Laurent", "last" : "Kakou"}, {"first" : "Amit Nataraj", "last" : "Shanbhoug"} ], "abstract": "This study examines trends in open access article processing charges (APCs) from 2011 \u2013 2021, building on a 2011 study by Solomon & Björk (2012). Two methods are employed, a modified replica and a status update of the 2011 journals. Data is drawn from multiple sources and datasets are available as open data (Morrison et al, 2021). Most journals do not charge APCs; this has not changed. The global average per-journal APC increased slightly, from 906 USD to 958 USD, while the per-article average increased from 904 USD to 1,626 USD, indicating that authors choose to publish in more expensive journals. Publisher size, type, impact metrics and subject affect charging tendencies, average APC and pricing trends. About half the journals from the 2011 sample are no longer listed in DOAJ in 2021, due to ceased publication or publisher de-listing. Conclusions include a caution about the potential of the APC model to increase costs beyond inflation, and a suggestion that support for the university sector, responsible for the majority of journals, nearly half the articles, with a tendency not to charge and very low average APCs, may be the most promising approach to achieve economically sustainable no-fee OA journal publishing.", "bibtexKey": "morrison2021access" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69/droessler", "tags" : [ "access","apc","article","charges","journal","kosten","open","processing","publishing","scholarly","studie" ], "intraHash" : "fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69", "interHash" : "6c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187", "label" : "Open access article processing charges 2011 - 2021", "user" : "droessler", "description" : "", "date" : "2021-12-07 20:53:30", "changeDate" : "2021-12-07 19:53:54", "count" : 2, "pub-type": "preprint", "year": "2021", "url": "http://hdl.handle.net/10393/42327", "author": [ "Heather Morrison","Luan Borges","Xuan Zhao","Tanoh Laurent Kakou","Amit Nataraj Shanbhoug" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Heather", "last" : "Morrison"}, {"first" : "Luan", "last" : "Borges"}, {"first" : "Xuan", "last" : "Zhao"}, {"first" : "Tanoh Laurent", "last" : "Kakou"}, {"first" : "Amit Nataraj", "last" : "Shanbhoug"} ], "abstract": "This study examines trends in open access article processing charges (APCs) from 2011 \u2013 2021, building on a 2011 study by Solomon & Björk (2012). Two methods are employed, a modified replica and a status update of the 2011 journals. Data is drawn from multiple sources and datasets are available as open data (Morrison et al, 2021). Most journals do not charge APCs; this has not changed. The global average per-journal APC increased slightly, from 906 USD to 958 USD, while the per-article average increased from 904 USD to 1,626 USD, indicating that authors choose to publish in more expensive journals. Publisher size, type, impact metrics and subject affect charging tendencies, average APC and pricing trends. About half the journals from the 2011 sample are no longer listed in DOAJ in 2021, due to ceased publication or publisher de-listing. Conclusions include a caution about the potential of the APC model to increase costs beyond inflation, and a suggestion that support for the university sector, responsible for the majority of journals, nearly half the articles, with a tendency not to charge and very low average APCs, may be the most promising approach to achieve economically sustainable no-fee OA journal publishing.", "bibtexKey": "morrison2021access" } ] }