{ "types" : { "Bookmark" : { "pluralLabel" : "Bookmarks" }, "Publication" : { "pluralLabel" : "Publications" }, "GoldStandardPublication" : { "pluralLabel" : "GoldStandardPublications" }, "GoldStandardBookmark" : { "pluralLabel" : "GoldStandardBookmarks" }, "Tag" : { "pluralLabel" : "Tags" }, "User" : { "pluralLabel" : "Users" }, "Group" : { "pluralLabel" : "Groups" }, "Sphere" : { "pluralLabel" : "Spheres" } }, "properties" : { "count" : { "valueType" : "number" }, "date" : { "valueType" : "date" }, "changeDate" : { "valueType" : "date" }, "url" : { "valueType" : "url" }, "id" : { "valueType" : "url" }, "tags" : { "valueType" : "item" }, "user" : { "valueType" : "item" } }, "items" : [ { "type" : "Bookmark", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/url/6ac725ea2f2fb6a3c1e0826bdffc8b65/droessler", "tags" : [ "access","apc","article","charges","contracs","esac","intact","oa","open","openapc","processing","project" ], "intraHash" : "6ac725ea2f2fb6a3c1e0826bdffc8b65", "label" : "ESAC \u2013 Efficiency and Standards for Article Charges", "user" : "droessler", "description" : "Article Processing Charges ", "date" : "2019-11-28 14:29:28", "changeDate" : "2021-11-15 23:39:02", "count" : 1, "url" : "https://esac-initiative.org/" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/22451a20cb31195bda30ecb76ad1a9505/droessler", "tags" : [ "access","apc","article","charges","kosten","kostenmonitoring","monitoring","oa","open","processing" ], "intraHash" : "2451a20cb31195bda30ecb76ad1a9505", "interHash" : "d6c4e5efaa81ae64fadc9f58e0e5733a", "label" : "Bearbeitung und Monitoring von Article Processing Charges an Universitätsbibliotheken in Deutschland. Aktuelle Befunde und Herausforderungen", "user" : "droessler", "description" : "", "date" : "2022-07-19 10:27:11", "changeDate" : "2022-07-19 08:28:43", "count" : 1, "pub-type": "misc", "year": "2022", "url": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6817486", "author": [ "Karin Beckmann" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Karin", "last" : "Beckmann"} ], "doi" : "10.5281/zenodo.6817486", "bibtexKey": "beckmann2022bearbeitung" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/20aa78f8fdbc0e8f399f3986ec137d6b8/droessler", "tags" : [ "Access","Article","Artikelgebühren","Bibliothek","Charges","Library","Open","Processing","Publikationsmarkt","Publishing","Publishing,","Publizieren,","Scientific","Scientist,","Verlagswesen,","Veröffentlichungswesen","Wissenschaftler","Wissenschaftliches","epistemologie","industry","market","oa","publication","widr" ], "intraHash" : "0aa78f8fdbc0e8f399f3986ec137d6b8", "interHash" : "0fcf54fbcf0446a56cd08182f67fc28e", "label" : "Open Access zwischen Revolution und Goldesel. Eine Bilanz fünfzehn Jahre nach der Erklärung der Budapest Open Access Initiative", "user" : "droessler", "description" : "", "date" : "2022-01-29 17:01:32", "changeDate" : "2022-01-29 16:01:32", "count" : 1, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis","publisher":"De Gruyter", "year": "2017", "url": "http://eprints.rclis.org/30959/", "author": [ "Ulrich Herb" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Ulrich", "last" : "Herb"} ], "volume": "68","number": "1","pages": "1--10","abstract": "The declaration and positions on Open Access in the early 2000s spread a mood of upheaval, euphoria, and idealism, a revolution of scientific publishing was regularly predicted. The expectations for Open Access were obvious and clear: scientists wanted to share their own articles immediately with other scientist (and they also wanted to have easy fulltext access to the texts of their colleagues), librarians needed a remedy for exploding journal prices, the scientific institutions wanted funded research to be efficiently and freely disseminated. Only the position of the commercial publishers to Open Access was predominantly hesitant or even disapproving.\r\nThis contribution attempts to draw a balance on Open Access - 15 years after the Budapest Open Access Initiative meeting in 2001. 2016 it must be noted that the hopes of Open Access advocates for a revolution will be disappointed. On the contrary, today the development of Open Access seems to be largely driven by the commercial publishers, which were barely mentioned in the early Open Access scenarios. Although there non-commercial Open Access in scientific self-administration exists, today the actors in scientific publishing are still the same as in 2001, and the already known concentration effects on the publishing market continue.", "doi" : "https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2017-0004", "bibtexKey": "herb2017access" } , { "type" : "Publication", "id" : "https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/203c074be60592832de858fb18e5ebf62/droessler", "tags" : [ "access","apc","article","charges","costs","journals","oa","open","processing","zeitschriften" ], "intraHash" : "03c074be60592832de858fb18e5ebf62", "interHash" : "91877855e103c4820dd297f37bd4701f", "label" : "Drivers of article processing charges in open access", "user" : "droessler", "description" : "", "date" : "2021-06-29 22:43:19", "changeDate" : "2021-06-29 20:43:19", "count" : 1, "pub-type": "article", "journal": "Scientometrics", "year": "2020", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03578-3", "author": [ "Oliver Budzinski","Thomas Grebel","Jens Wolling","Xijie Zhang" ], "authors": [ {"first" : "Oliver", "last" : "Budzinski"}, {"first" : "Thomas", "last" : "Grebel"}, {"first" : "Jens", "last" : "Wolling"}, {"first" : "Xijie", "last" : "Zhang"} ], "volume": "124","number": "3","pages": "2185--2206","abstract": "Large publishing companies have been dominating scientific publishing for long, which leads to high subscription fees and inhibited access to scientific knowledge. At digital era, the opportunity of an unrestricted access appears feasible, because the cost of publishing should be low. It is no longer the readers and libraries to pay subscription fees, but scientific organizations and authors themselves who pay for the cost of having their article published. As the data shows, there is a tremendous variance of article processing charges (APC) across journals, which obviously cannot be explained by the costs. One of the explanatory variables could be reputation, but it only contributes less than 5\\% to the variance in average APC. This study is meant to shed light on the various determinants of APC. Based on the data from the OpenAPC Initiative, the Directory of Open Access Journals and three different datasets of Web of Science, we employ ANOVAs and multivariate regressions. The results show that market power plays an important role to explain APC, inter alia, through market concentration, market position of individual publishers (publisher size), and the choice of hybrid publishing model.", "issn" : "1588-2861", "doi" : "10.1007/s11192-020-03578-3", "bibtexKey": "Budzinski2020" } ] }