{"52d73058f506f95de9b93721a487661fdiglezakis":{"DOI":"10.5281/zenodo.13862158","ISBN":"","ISSN":"","URL":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13862158","abstract":"","annote":"","author":[{"family":"Baum","given":"Roman"},{"family":"Bouazzouni","given":"Syphax"},{"family":"Fillies","given":"Jan"},{"family":"Karam","given":"Naouel"},{"family":"Koepler","given":"Oliver"},{"family":"Oladazimi","given":"Pooya"},{"family":"Sasse","given":"Julia"}],"citation-label":"baum_2024_13862158","collection-editor":[],"collection-title":"","container-author":[],"container-title":"","documents":[],"edition":"","editor":[],"event-date":{"date-parts":[["2024","09"]],"literal":"2024"},"event-place":"","id":"52d73058f506f95de9b93721a487661fdiglezakis","interhash":"f558612a3d9ba6766bd853066de60787","intrahash":"52d73058f506f95de9b93721a487661f","issue":"","issued":{"date-parts":[["2024","09"]],"literal":"2024"},"keyword":"terminologies survey requirements nfdi","misc":{"doi":"10.5281/zenodo.13862158"},"note":"","number":"","page":"","page-first":"","publisher":"Zenodo","publisher-place":"","status":"","title":"TS4NFDI Requirements Analysis Report","type":"article","username":"diglezakis","version":"","volume":""},"73e96f10baee839e34773b3ae7d9f100diglezakis":{"DOI":"10.5281/zenodo.12704414","ISBN":"","ISSN":"","URL":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12704414","abstract":"","annote":"","author":[{"family":"Castro","given":"Leyla Jael"},{"family":"Ferenz","given":"Stephan"},{"family":"Hajiabadi","given":"Hamideh"},{"family":"Kuckertz","given":"Patrick"},{"family":"Löbe","given":"Matthias"},{"family":"Schmidt","given":"Christian"},{"family":"Struck","given":"Alexander"},{"family":"Thiery","given":"Florian"}],"citation-label":"castro_2024_12704414","collection-editor":[],"collection-title":"","container-author":[],"container-title":"","documents":[],"edition":"","editor":[],"event-date":{"date-parts":[["2024","08"]],"literal":"2024"},"event-place":"","id":"73e96f10baee839e34773b3ae7d9f100diglezakis","interhash":"bb5fccb9d2a2d080f999fbceb4c8a244","intrahash":"73e96f10baee839e34773b3ae7d9f100","issue":"","issued":{"date-parts":[["2024","08"]],"literal":"2024"},"keyword":"forschungsdaten metadata software survey nfdi","misc":{"doi":"10.5281/zenodo.12704414"},"note":"","number":"","page":"","page-first":"","publisher":"Zenodo","publisher-place":"","status":"","title":"Results on a Survey on Research Software Metadata\r\n                   in the NFDI Consortia","type":"article","username":"diglezakis","version":"","volume":""},"0ec007c2664b56944652ca03d0b80e9cdiglezakis":{"DOI":"10.5281/zenodo.10598900","ISBN":"","ISSN":"","URL":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10598900","abstract":"","annote":"","author":[{"family":"Linxweiler","given":"Jan"},{"family":"Hensel","given":"Tom"},{"family":"Wermbter","given":"Katja"}],"citation-label":"linxweiler_2024_10598900","collection-editor":[],"collection-title":"","container-author":[],"container-title":"","documents":[],"edition":"","editor":[],"event-date":{"date-parts":[["2024","01"]],"literal":"2024"},"event-place":"","id":"0ec007c2664b56944652ca03d0b80e9cdiglezakis","interhash":"570444aae460ced4357e2a789b2478a8","intrahash":"0ec007c2664b56944652ca03d0b80e9c","issue":"","issued":{"date-parts":[["2024","01"]],"literal":"2024"},"keyword":"forschungsdaten motivation nfdi4ing survey nfdi","misc":{"doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10598900"},"note":"","number":"","page":"","page-first":"","publisher":"Zenodo","publisher-place":"","status":"","title":"NFDI4Ing Community Survey 2023","type":"dataset","username":"diglezakis","version":"","volume":""},"8bde22f534ceccbb12020d612cc1a77adiglezakis":{"DOI":"10.5334/dsj-2022-018","ISBN":"","ISSN":"","URL":"https://doi.org/10.5334%2Fdsj-2022-018","abstract":"","annote":"","author":[{"family":"Kindling","given":"Maxi"},{"family":"Strecker","given":"Dorothea"}],"citation-label":"Kindling_2022","collection-editor":[],"collection-title":"","container-author":[],"container-title":"Data Science Journal","documents":[],"edition":"","editor":[],"event-date":{"date-parts":[["2022"]],"literal":"2022"},"event-place":"","id":"8bde22f534ceccbb12020d612cc1a77adiglezakis","interhash":"b04e17d6600d187354cf0f24ae059562","intrahash":"8bde22f534ceccbb12020d612cc1a77a","issue":"","issued":{"date-parts":[["2022"]],"literal":"2022"},"keyword":"forschungsdaten dataQuality survey repository","misc":{"doi":"10.5334/dsj-2022-018"},"note":"","number":"","page":"","page-first":"","publisher":"Ubiquity Press, Ltd.","publisher-place":"","status":"","title":"Data Quality Assurance at Research Data Repositories","type":"article-journal","username":"diglezakis","version":"","volume":"21"},"90b81897015721bcff9de9224b631570diglezakis":{"DOI":"10.1515/bd-2019-0098","ISBN":"","ISSN":"","URL":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bd-2019-0098","abstract":"","annote":"","author":[{"family":"Ostendorff","given":"Philipp"},{"family":"Linke","given":"David"}],"citation-label":"BestPracticesimUmgangmitrechtlichenFragestellungenzumForschungsdatenmanagementFDM","collection-editor":[],"collection-title":"","container-author":[],"container-title":"Bibliotheksdienst","documents":[],"edition":"","editor":[],"event-date":{"date-parts":[["2019"]],"literal":"2019"},"event-place":"Berlin, Boston","id":"90b81897015721bcff9de9224b631570diglezakis","interhash":"ce44b0c325ad10905bfac6336935585f","intrahash":"90b81897015721bcff9de9224b631570","issue":"10-11","issued":{"date-parts":[["2019"]],"literal":"2019"},"keyword":"bestPractice forschungsdaten beratung rechtlicheFragestellungen survey","misc":{"doi":"10.1515/bd-2019-0098"},"note":"","number":"10-11","page":"","page-first":"","publisher":"De Gruyter Saur","publisher-place":"Berlin, Boston","status":"","title":"Best-Practices im Umgang mit rechtlichen Fragestellungen zum Forschungsdatenmanagement (FDM)","type":"article-journal","username":"diglezakis","version":"","volume":"53"},"519f5cd07a9abfded7049488cc7b32d7diglezakis":{"DOI":"10.25534/tudatalib-104","ISBN":"","ISSN":"","URL":"https://tudatalib.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/handle/tudatalib/2082","abstract":"Die Online-Umfrage \"NFDI4Ing - Rückmeldung aus den Forschungscommunities\" wurde vom Konsortium NFDI4Ing (Nationale Forschungsdateninfrastruktur für die Ingenieurwissenschaften, https://nfdi4ing.de) vom 21.08.2019 bis einschließlich 16.09.2019 durchgeführt.\r\nZielgruppe waren die Leiter von ingenieurwissenschaftlichen Forschungsgruppen, im Sinne von Lehrstühlen / Professurenn / Fachgebieten an Hochschulen und Universitäten sowie Verbundprojekte (z.B. SFBs) und einzelne Forschungsabteilungen außeruniversitärer Forschungseinrichtungen (z.B. Forschungsbereiche eines Fraunhofer-Instituts).\r\nEs wurden alle ingenieurwissenschaftlichen Forschungseinrichtungen Deutschlands angeschrieben (Fachbereiche von Universitäten und Hochschulen, Verbundprojekte (SFBs, GRKs, Exzellenzcluster), Fraunhofer-, Leibniz-, Max-Planck-Institute, Helmholtz-Zentren, Ressortforschungseinrichtungen, Fachgesellschaften- und verbände).\r\nInsgesamt wurden 701 Fragebögen ausgefüllt, davon 618 vollständig.","annote":"","author":[{"family":"Jagusch","given":"Gerald Wolfgang"},{"family":"Preuß","given":"Nils"}],"citation-label":"jagusch2019umfragedaten","collection-editor":[],"collection-title":"","container-author":[],"container-title":"","documents":[],"edition":"","editor":[],"event-date":{"date-parts":[["2019"]],"literal":"2019"},"event-place":"","id":"519f5cd07a9abfded7049488cc7b32d7diglezakis","interhash":"ba2b97d1e7346499f40ed6a6ec3e417c","intrahash":"519f5cd07a9abfded7049488cc7b32d7","issue":"","issued":{"date-parts":[["2019"]],"literal":"2019"},"keyword":"forschungsdaten survey engineering","misc":{"doi":"10.25534/tudatalib-104"},"note":"","number":"","page":"","page-first":"","publisher":"","publisher-place":"","status":"","title":"Umfragedaten zu \"NFDI4Ing - Rückmeldung aus den Forschungscommunities\"","type":"dataset","username":"diglezakis","version":"","volume":""},"798e1964f4113bd9a5954ce322a39a95diglezakis":{"DOI":"10.1080/01639370902737240","ISBN":"","ISSN":"","URL":"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01639370902737240","abstract":"This study presents the current state of research and practice on metadata quality through focus on the functional perspective on metadata quality, measurement, and evaluation criteria coupled with mechanisms for improving metadata quality. Quality metadata reflect the degree to which the metadata in question perform the core bibliographic functions of discovery, use, provenance, currency, authentication, and administration. The functional perspective is closely tied to the criteria and measurements used for assessing metadata quality. Accuracy, completeness, and consistency are the most common criteria used in measuring metadata quality in the literature. Guidelines embedded within a Web form or template perform a valuable function in improving the quality of the metadata. Results of the study indicate a pressing need for the building of a common data model that is interoperable across digital repositories.","annote":"","author":[{"family":"Park","given":"Jung-Ran"}],"citation-label":"doi:10.1080/01639370902737240","collection-editor":[],"collection-title":"","container-author":[],"container-title":"Cataloging & Classification Quarterly","documents":[],"edition":"","editor":[],"event-date":{"date-parts":[["2009"]],"literal":"2009"},"event-place":"","id":"798e1964f4113bd9a5954ce322a39a95diglezakis","interhash":"c2593fe92c622904bc8e16f77c93b50f","intrahash":"798e1964f4113bd9a5954ce322a39a95","issue":"3-4","issued":{"date-parts":[["2009"]],"literal":"2009"},"keyword":"imported forschungsdaten metadata survey quality repository","misc":{"eprint":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370902737240","doi":"10.1080/01639370902737240"},"note":"","number":"3-4","number-of-pages":"15","page":"213-228","page-first":"213","publisher":"Routledge","publisher-place":"","status":"","title":"Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories: A Survey of the Current State of the Art","type":"article-journal","username":"diglezakis","version":"","volume":"47"},"729588988cf4c28af61b03283c64a401diglezakis":{"DOI":"10.1080/01639374.2010.508711","ISBN":"","ISSN":"","URL":"https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2010.508711","abstract":"This article evaluates practices on metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections using an online survey of cataloging and metadata professionals in the United States. The study examines (1) the perceived importance of metadata quality, (2) metadata quality evaluation criteria and issues, and (3) mechanisms for building quality assurance into the metadata creation process. The survey finds wide recognition of the essential role of metadata quality assurance. Accuracy and consistency are prioritized as the main criteria for metadata quality evaluation. Metadata semantics greatly affects consistent and accurate metadata application. Strong awareness of metadata quality correlates with the widespread adoption of various quality control mechanisms, such as staff training, manual review, metadata guidelines, and metadata generation tools. And yet, metadata guidelines are used less frequently as a quality assurance mechanism in digital collections involving multiple institutions.","annote":"","author":[{"family":"Park","given":"Jung-Ran"},{"family":"Tosaka","given":"Yuji"}],"citation-label":"doi:10.1080/01639374.2010.508711","collection-editor":[],"collection-title":"","container-author":[],"container-title":"Cataloging & Classification Quarterly","documents":[],"edition":"","editor":[],"event-date":{"date-parts":[["2010"]],"literal":"2010"},"event-place":"","id":"729588988cf4c28af61b03283c64a401diglezakis","interhash":"1b0c8c0d926e01dabb1352e3c153fc17","intrahash":"729588988cf4c28af61b03283c64a401","issue":"8","issued":{"date-parts":[["2010"]],"literal":"2010"},"keyword":"forschungsdaten metadata survey quality repository","misc":{"eprint":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2010.508711","doi":"10.1080/01639374.2010.508711"},"note":"","number":"8","number-of-pages":"19","page":"696-715","page-first":"696","publisher":"Routledge","publisher-place":"","status":"","title":"Metadata Quality Control in Digital Repositories and Collections: Criteria, Semantics, and Mechanisms","type":"article-journal","username":"diglezakis","version":"","volume":"48"},"5b0cb050b8d7ec5575280af372fa9757diglezakis":{"DOI":"","ISBN":"","ISSN":"","URL":"","abstract":"","annote":"","author":[{"family":"Jensen","given":"Uwe"}],"citation-label":"noauthororeditor","collection-editor":[],"collection-title":"","container-author":[],"container-title":"","documents":[],"edition":"","editor":[],"event-date":{"date-parts":[["2012"]],"literal":"2012"},"event-place":"","id":"5b0cb050b8d7ec5575280af372fa9757diglezakis","interhash":"24bc927e24e8604de9317ebcff1d434c","intrahash":"5b0cb050b8d7ec5575280af372fa9757","issue":"","issued":{"date-parts":[["2012"]],"literal":"2012"},"keyword":"forschungsdaten leitlinien survey sozialwissenschaften","note":"","number":"","page":"","page-first":"","publisher":"","publisher-place":"","status":"","title":"Leitlinien zum Management von Forschungsdaten","type":"report","username":"diglezakis","version":"","volume":""},"1628bb59ee6d5082a41b6e2d5605f03fdiglezakis":{"DOI":"10.5281/zenodo.1168800","ISBN":"","ISSN":"","URL":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1168800","abstract":"","annote":"","author":[{"family":"Stewards","given":"TU Delft Data"},{"family":"Team","given":"EPFL Library Research Data"},{"family":"Krause","given":"Jan"},{"family":"Lambeng","given":"Nathalie"},{"family":"Andrews","given":"Heather"},{"family":"Boehmer","given":"Jasmin"},{"family":"Cruz","given":"Maria"},{"family":"van Dijck","given":"Jasper"},{"family":"den Heijter","given":"Kees"},{"family":"van der Kruyk","given":"Munire"},{"family":"Teperek","given":"Marta"}],"citation-label":"tu_delft_data_stewards_2018_1168800","collection-editor":[],"collection-title":"","container-author":[],"container-title":"","documents":[],"edition":"","editor":[],"event-date":{"date-parts":[["2018","02"]],"literal":"2018"},"event-place":"","id":"1628bb59ee6d5082a41b6e2d5605f03fdiglezakis","interhash":"eb5bb4085114cbf45314a0a6172ec926","intrahash":"1628bb59ee6d5082a41b6e2d5605f03f","issue":"","issued":{"date-parts":[["2018","02"]],"literal":"2018"},"keyword":"daten forschungsdaten motivation survey","misc":{"doi":"10.5281/zenodo.1168800"},"note":"Subfield separators normalized","number":"","page":"","page-first":"","publisher":"","publisher-place":"","status":"","title":"Quantitative assessment of research data management practice","type":"article","username":"diglezakis","version":"","volume":""}}