https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/group/open-access/processing%20ProcessingPUMA RSS feed for /group/open-access/processing%20Processing2026-04-03T22:23:17+02:00https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2576f17fdcd32ebb4f299bd7e6676075b/droesslerdroessler2024-10-31T20:20:25+01:00apc oligopoly charges access processing publishing article open publisher <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Leigh-Ann Butler" itemprop="url" href="/person/13397868ab7c24802e703c5d12230cf93/author/0"><span itemprop="name">L. Butler</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Lisa Matthias" itemprop="url" href="/person/13397868ab7c24802e703c5d12230cf93/author/1"><span itemprop="name">L. Matthias</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Marc-André Simard" itemprop="url" href="/person/13397868ab7c24802e703c5d12230cf93/author/2"><span itemprop="name">M. Simard</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Philippe Mongeon" itemprop="url" href="/person/13397868ab7c24802e703c5d12230cf93/author/3"><span itemprop="name">P. Mongeon</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Stefanie Haustein" itemprop="url" href="/person/13397868ab7c24802e703c5d12230cf93/author/4"><span itemprop="name">S. Haustein</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">Quantitative Science Studies</span>, </em> <em><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationVolume" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><span itemprop="volumeNumber">4 </span></span>(<span itemprop="issueNumber">4</span>): <span itemprop="pagination">778--799</span></em> </span>(<em><span>November 2023<meta content="November 2023" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Thu Oct 31 20:20:25 CET 2024Quantitative Science Studies114778--799The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges42023apc oligopoly charges access processing publishing article open publisher We aim to estimate the total amount of article processing charges (APCs) paid to publish open access (OA) in journals controlled by the five large commercial publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor &amp; Francis, and Wiley) between 2015 and 2018. Using publication data from WoS, OA status from Unpaywall, and annual APC prices from open data sets and historical fees retrieved via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, we estimate that globally authors paid $1.06 billion in publication fees to these publishers from 2015–2018. Revenue from gold OA amounted to $612.5 million, and $448.3 million was obtained for publishing OA in hybrid journals. Among the five publishers, Springer Nature made the most revenue from OA ($589.7 million), followed by Elsevier ($221.4 million), Wiley ($114.3 million), Taylor &amp; Francis ($76.8 million), and Sage ($31.6 million). With Elsevier and Wiley making most of their APC revenue from hybrid fees and others focusing on gold, different OA strategies could be observed between publishers.https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/22451a20cb31195bda30ecb76ad1a9505/droesslerdroessler2022-07-19T10:27:11+02:00oa apc charges monitoring access kosten processing article open kostenmonitoring <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Karin Beckmann" itemprop="url" href="/person/1d6c4e5efaa81ae64fadc9f58e0e5733a/author/0"><span itemprop="name">K. Beckmann</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information">(<em><span>July 2022<meta content="July 2022" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Tue Jul 19 10:27:11 CEST 202207Bearbeitung und Monitoring von Article Processing Charges an Universitätsbibliotheken in Deutschland. Aktuelle Befunde und Herausforderungen2022oa apc charges monitoring access kosten processing article open kostenmonitoring https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/20aa78f8fdbc0e8f399f3986ec137d6b8/droesslerdroessler2022-01-29T17:01:32+01:00Bibliothek Article Publizieren, Artikelgebühren Publishing, Scientific widr Wissenschaftler industry Open Processing Access Veröffentlichungswesen publication oa Wissenschaftliches Publishing epistemologie Scientist, Verlagswesen, market Library Charges Publikationsmarkt <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Ulrich Herb" itemprop="url" href="/person/10fcf54fbcf0446a56cd08182f67fc28e/author/0"><span itemprop="name">U. Herb</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">Information - Wissenschaft &amp; Praxis</span>, </em> <em><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationVolume" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><span itemprop="volumeNumber">68 </span></span>(<span itemprop="issueNumber">1</span>): <span itemprop="pagination">1--10</span></em> </span>(<em><span>February 2017<meta content="February 2017" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Sat Jan 29 17:01:32 CET 2022Information - Wissenschaft \& Praxis0211--10Open Access zwischen Revolution und Goldesel. Eine Bilanz f{\"u}nfzehn Jahre nach der Erkl{\"a}rung der Budapest Open Access Initiative682017Bibliothek Article Publizieren, Artikelgebühren Publishing, Scientific widr Wissenschaftler industry Open Processing Access Veröffentlichungswesen publication oa Wissenschaftliches Publishing epistemologie Scientist, Verlagswesen, market Library Charges Publikationsmarkt The declaration and positions on Open Access in the early 2000s spread a mood of upheaval, euphoria, and idealism, a revolution of scientific publishing was regularly predicted. The expectations for Open Access were obvious and clear: scientists wanted to share their own articles immediately with other scientist (and they also wanted to have easy fulltext access to the texts of their colleagues), librarians needed a remedy for exploding journal prices, the scientific institutions wanted funded research to be efficiently and freely disseminated. Only the position of the commercial publishers to Open Access was predominantly hesitant or even disapproving. This contribution attempts to draw a balance on Open Access - 15 years after the Budapest Open Access Initiative meeting in 2001. 2016 it must be noted that the hopes of Open Access advocates for a revolution will be disappointed. On the contrary, today the development of Open Access seems to be largely driven by the commercial publishers, which were barely mentioned in the early Open Access scenarios. Although there non-commercial Open Access in scientific self-administration exists, today the actors in scientific publishing are still the same as in 2001, and the already known concentration effects on the publishing market continue.https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69/open-accessopen-access2021-12-07T20:53:54+01:00scholarly journal apc charges access kosten processing publishing studie article open from:droessler <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Heather Morrison" itemprop="url" href="/person/16c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187/author/0"><span itemprop="name">H. Morrison</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Luan Borges" itemprop="url" href="/person/16c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187/author/1"><span itemprop="name">L. Borges</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Xuan Zhao" itemprop="url" href="/person/16c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187/author/2"><span itemprop="name">X. Zhao</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Tanoh Laurent Kakou" itemprop="url" href="/person/16c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187/author/3"><span itemprop="name">T. Kakou</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Amit Nataraj Shanbhoug" itemprop="url" href="/person/16c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187/author/4"><span itemprop="name">A. Shanbhoug</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information">(<em><span>Jun 24, 2021<meta content="Jun 24, 2021" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Tue Dec 07 20:53:54 CET 202106Open access article processing charges 2011 - 20212021scholarly journal apc charges access kosten processing publishing studie article open from:droessler 24This study examines trends in open access article processing charges (APCs) from 2011 – 2021, building on a 2011 study by Solomon & Björk (2012). Two methods are employed, a modified replica and a status update of the 2011 journals. Data is drawn from multiple sources and datasets are available as open data (Morrison et al, 2021). Most journals do not charge APCs; this has not changed. The global average per-journal APC increased slightly, from 906 USD to 958 USD, while the per-article average increased from 904 USD to 1,626 USD, indicating that authors choose to publish in more expensive journals. Publisher size, type, impact metrics and subject affect charging tendencies, average APC and pricing trends. About half the journals from the 2011 sample are no longer listed in DOAJ in 2021, due to ceased publication or publisher de-listing. Conclusions include a caution about the potential of the APC model to increase costs beyond inflation, and a suggestion that support for the university sector, responsible for the majority of journals, nearly half the articles, with a tendency not to charge and very low average APCs, may be the most promising approach to achieve economically sustainable no-fee OA journal publishing.https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2fde41f67bed7439c9e043bb342db3a69/droesslerdroessler2021-12-07T20:53:30+01:00scholarly journal apc charges access kosten processing publishing studie article open <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Heather Morrison" itemprop="url" href="/person/16c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187/author/0"><span itemprop="name">H. Morrison</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Luan Borges" itemprop="url" href="/person/16c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187/author/1"><span itemprop="name">L. Borges</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Xuan Zhao" itemprop="url" href="/person/16c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187/author/2"><span itemprop="name">X. Zhao</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Tanoh Laurent Kakou" itemprop="url" href="/person/16c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187/author/3"><span itemprop="name">T. Kakou</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Amit Nataraj Shanbhoug" itemprop="url" href="/person/16c941b128fc10160157e4cf82d19a187/author/4"><span itemprop="name">A. Shanbhoug</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information">(<em><span>Jun 24, 2021<meta content="Jun 24, 2021" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Tue Dec 07 20:53:30 CET 202106Open access article processing charges 2011 - 20212021scholarly journal apc charges access kosten processing publishing studie article open 24This study examines trends in open access article processing charges (APCs) from 2011 – 2021, building on a 2011 study by Solomon & Björk (2012). Two methods are employed, a modified replica and a status update of the 2011 journals. Data is drawn from multiple sources and datasets are available as open data (Morrison et al, 2021). Most journals do not charge APCs; this has not changed. The global average per-journal APC increased slightly, from 906 USD to 958 USD, while the per-article average increased from 904 USD to 1,626 USD, indicating that authors choose to publish in more expensive journals. Publisher size, type, impact metrics and subject affect charging tendencies, average APC and pricing trends. About half the journals from the 2011 sample are no longer listed in DOAJ in 2021, due to ceased publication or publisher de-listing. Conclusions include a caution about the potential of the APC model to increase costs beyond inflation, and a suggestion that support for the university sector, responsible for the majority of journals, nearly half the articles, with a tendency not to charge and very low average APCs, may be the most promising approach to achieve economically sustainable no-fee OA journal publishing.https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/203c074be60592832de858fb18e5ebf62/droesslerdroessler2021-06-29T22:43:19+02:00oa costs apc charges access processing zeitschriften journals article open <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Oliver Budzinski" itemprop="url" href="/person/191877855e103c4820dd297f37bd4701f/author/0"><span itemprop="name">O. Budzinski</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Thomas Grebel" itemprop="url" href="/person/191877855e103c4820dd297f37bd4701f/author/1"><span itemprop="name">T. Grebel</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Jens Wolling" itemprop="url" href="/person/191877855e103c4820dd297f37bd4701f/author/2"><span itemprop="name">J. Wolling</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Xijie Zhang" itemprop="url" href="/person/191877855e103c4820dd297f37bd4701f/author/3"><span itemprop="name">X. Zhang</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">Scientometrics</span>, </em> <em><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationVolume" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><span itemprop="volumeNumber">124 </span></span>(<span itemprop="issueNumber">3</span>): <span itemprop="pagination">2185--2206</span></em> </span>(<em><span>Sep 1, 2020<meta content="Sep 1, 2020" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Tue Jun 29 22:43:19 CEST 2021Scientometrics0932185--2206Drivers of article processing charges in open access1242020oa costs apc charges access processing zeitschriften journals article open 01Large publishing companies have been dominating scientific publishing for long, which leads to high subscription fees and inhibited access to scientific knowledge. At digital era, the opportunity of an unrestricted access appears feasible, because the cost of publishing should be low. It is no longer the readers and libraries to pay subscription fees, but scientific organizations and authors themselves who pay for the cost of having their article published. As the data shows, there is a tremendous variance of article processing charges (APC) across journals, which obviously cannot be explained by the costs. One of the explanatory variables could be reputation, but it only contributes less than 5{\%} to the variance in average APC. This study is meant to shed light on the various determinants of APC. Based on the data from the OpenAPC Initiative, the Directory of Open Access Journals and three different datasets of Web of Science, we employ ANOVAs and multivariate regressions. The results show that market power plays an important role to explain APC, inter alia, through market concentration, market position of individual publishers (publisher size), and the choice of hybrid publishing model.https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2481cbb9c39d1a72173c044eb6957e949/droesslerdroessler2018-09-26T12:06:42+02:00access Universities Open health Global economics Publishing charges macht processing power Libraries Stratification <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Kyle Siler" itemprop="url" href="/person/187abd41958c7861ef0a576888cf9ff5b/author/0"><span itemprop="name">K. Siler</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Stefanie Haustein" itemprop="url" href="/person/187abd41958c7861ef0a576888cf9ff5b/author/1"><span itemprop="name">S. Haustein</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Elise Smith" itemprop="url" href="/person/187abd41958c7861ef0a576888cf9ff5b/author/2"><span itemprop="name">E. Smith</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Vincent Larivière" itemprop="url" href="/person/187abd41958c7861ef0a576888cf9ff5b/author/3"><span itemprop="name">V. Larivière</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Juan Pablo Alperin" itemprop="url" href="/person/187abd41958c7861ef0a576888cf9ff5b/author/4"><span itemprop="name">J. Alperin</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">PeerJ</span>, </em> </span>(<em><span>February 2018<meta content="February 2018" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Wed Sep 26 12:06:42 CEST 2018PeerJ02e4269Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research62018access Universities Open health Global economics Publishing charges macht processing power Libraries Stratification Using a database of recent articles published in the field of Global Health research, we examine institutional sources of stratification in publishing access outcomes. Traditionally, the focus on inequality in scientific publishing has focused on prestige hierarchies in established print journals. This project examines stratification in contemporary publishing with a particular focus on subscription vs. various Open Access (OA) publishing options. Findings show that authors working at lower-ranked universities are more likely to publish in closed/paywalled outlets, and less likely to choose outlets that involve some sort of Article Processing Charge (APCs; gold or hybrid OA). We also analyze institutional differences and stratification in the APC costs paid in various journals. Authors affiliated with higher-ranked institutions, as well as hospitals and non-profit organizations pay relatively higher APCs for gold and hybrid OA publications. Results suggest that authors affiliated with high-ranked universities and well-funded institutions tend to have more resources to choose pay options with publishing. Our research suggests new professional hierarchies developing in contemporary publishing, where various OA publishing options are becoming increasingly prominent. Just as there is stratification in institutional representation \textit{between} different types of publishing access, there is also inequality \textit{within} access types. https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2cee6beee13cb8926a81fd68609095f76/hermannhermann2018-02-14T21:53:58+01:00forschungsdaten systems management software Workflow processing workflowTracking <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Rafael Ferreira da Silva" itemprop="url" href="/person/1d2e5fb161c8874dfbde96a79d3a6e0e7/author/0"><span itemprop="name">R. da Silva</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Rosa Filgueira" itemprop="url" href="/person/1d2e5fb161c8874dfbde96a79d3a6e0e7/author/1"><span itemprop="name">R. Filgueira</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Ilia Pietri" itemprop="url" href="/person/1d2e5fb161c8874dfbde96a79d3a6e0e7/author/2"><span itemprop="name">I. Pietri</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Ming Jiang" itemprop="url" href="/person/1d2e5fb161c8874dfbde96a79d3a6e0e7/author/3"><span itemprop="name">M. Jiang</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Rizos Sakellariou" itemprop="url" href="/person/1d2e5fb161c8874dfbde96a79d3a6e0e7/author/4"><span itemprop="name">R. Sakellariou</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Ewa Deelman" itemprop="url" href="/person/1d2e5fb161c8874dfbde96a79d3a6e0e7/author/5"><span itemprop="name">E. Deelman</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">Future Generation Computer Systems</span>, </em> </span>(<em><span>2017<meta content="2017" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Wed Feb 14 21:53:58 CET 2018Future Generation Computer Systems228 - 238A characterization of workflow management systems for extreme-scale applications752017forschungsdaten systems management software Workflow processing workflowTracking https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2af1731fdd1f24d319fb23b9cb198a282/droesslerdroessler2017-05-30T14:54:44+02:00Kosten Publikationsanalyse access Article Kennzahlen Berlin Zeitschriftenartikel Open Processing Access journal APC Charges articles open Gold <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Michaela Voigt" itemprop="url" href="/person/12ab4bf06d4018302a032517deafe9fd2/author/0"><span itemprop="name">M. Voigt</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Christian Winterhalter" itemprop="url" href="/person/12ab4bf06d4018302a032517deafe9fd2/author/1"><span itemprop="name">C. Winterhalter</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"> </span>(<em><span>2016<meta content="2016" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Tue May 30 14:54:44 CEST 2017Open-Access-Anteil bei Zeitschriftenartikeln von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern an Einrichtungen des Landes Berlin. Datenauswertung für die Jahre 2013–20152016Kosten Publikationsanalyse access Article Kennzahlen Berlin Zeitschriftenartikel Open Processing Access journal APC Charges articles open Gold