PUMA publications for /user/droessler/knowledgehttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/user/droessler/knowledgePUMA RSS feed for /user/droessler/knowledge2024-03-29T10:25:21+01:00Open Initiatives: Offenheit in der digitalen Welt und Wissenschafthttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2b191bc08cb7bb72bbe318be8e3d4e219/droesslerdroessler2022-01-29T16:56:09+01:00science oa government epistemologie access data widr knowledge open research <span data-person-type="editor" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="editor"><a title="Ulrich Herb" itemprop="url" href="/person/129e9ff0f192566664188595832d48015/editor/0"><span itemprop="name">U. Herb</span></a></span></span> (Eds.) </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><em>Saarbrücker Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft </em><em><span itemprop="publisher">universaar Universitätsverlag des Saarlandes</span>, </em>(<em><span>2012<meta content="2012" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Sat Jan 29 16:56:09 CET 2022Saarbrücker Schriften zur InformationswissenschaftOpen Initiatives: Offenheit in der digitalen Welt und Wissenschaft2012science oa government epistemologie access data widr knowledge open research Initiativen, die Transparenz, offenen und möglichst einfachen Zugang zu Informationen, etwa in Wissenschaft und Verwaltung fordern und herstellen, gewinnen rasant an Bedeutung und beginnen sich immer weiter zu differenzieren. Die Forderungen reichen von freiem (im Sinne von kostenlosem) Zugang zu Informationen bis hin zu offenem Zugang analog den Prinzipien der Open Source Community. Manche Initiativen und Phänomene fokussieren stärker auf Transparenz als auf Offenheit, wie z.B. die Whistleblower-Plattform Wikileaks, während wiederum andere (z.B. Open Government oder Open Access zu Forschungsdaten) die Forderungen nach Transparenz und Offenheit kombinieren oder sich an der Bereitstellung nicht-proprietärer Informationen versuchen (wie das Geodaten-Projekt OpenStreetMap oder die Open Metrics Konzepte im Wissenschaftskontext). Zwölf Autorinnen und Autoren aus Open Data Projekten und aus den Bereichen Open Access, Open Science, Journalismus und Recht beschreiben und analysieren die besagten und andere Open Initiatives, diskutieren deren Gemeinsamkeiten und Grenzen sowie radikale Offenheitskonzepte wie WikiLeaks und Anonymous.Open Access, a New Kind of Emerging Knowledge Regime?https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/28e378dace040200a7767cbf9a4e4e3ec/droesslerdroessler2022-08-15T16:52:53+02:00oa access regime divide knowledge open <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Elena Simukovic" itemprop="url" href="/person/1aca80fb4c337211317087e4f15465053/author/0"><span itemprop="name">E. Simukovic</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">Open Divide: Critical Studies on Open Access</span>, </em><em><span itemprop="publisher">Litwin Books</span>, </em><em>Sacramento, CA, </em></span>(<em><span>2018<meta content="2018" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Mon Aug 15 16:52:53 CEST 2022Sacramento, CAOpen Divide: Critical Studies on Open Access31-40Open Access, a New Kind of Emerging Knowledge Regime?2018oa access regime divide knowledge open Knowledge Unlatched als Wegbereiter eines genossenschaftlichen Ansatzes zur Ermöglichung von Open Accesshttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2fcf1c4ea2562fdc51834fa4c113a9c62/droesslerdroessler2022-12-31T16:04:02+01:00access unlatched knowledge open <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Ralf Schimmer" itemprop="url" href="/person/1c4afb99b2c155d89531c3e8c2e7f9bb0/author/0"><span itemprop="name">R. Schimmer</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">Praxishandbuch Open Access</span>, </em><em><span itemprop="publisher">De Gruyter</span>, </em></span>(<em><span>2017<meta content="2017" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Sat Dec 31 16:04:02 CET 2022Praxishandbuch Open Access112-118Knowledge Unlatched als Wegbereiter eines genossenschaftlichen Ansatzes zur Ermöglichung von Open Access2017access unlatched knowledge open In pursuit of open science, open access is not enoughhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2e64f05eedd13cedb7eb177af11773676/droesslerdroessler2023-04-12T15:13:22+02:00science access monopoly knowledge open infrastrukture <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Claudio Aspesi" itemprop="url" href="/person/15e4c70311ac065f907574a3498d08e73/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Aspesi</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Amy Brand" itemprop="url" href="/person/15e4c70311ac065f907574a3498d08e73/author/1"><span itemprop="name">A. Brand</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">Science</span>, </em> <em><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationVolume" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><span itemprop="volumeNumber">368 </span></span>(<span itemprop="issueNumber">6491</span>):
<span itemprop="pagination">574-577</span></em> </span>(<em><span>2020<meta content="2020" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Wed Apr 12 15:13:22 CEST 2023Science6491574-577In pursuit of open science, open access is not enough3682020science access monopoly knowledge open infrastrukture Preventing monopolies in knowledge infrastructure is the next battleground for publishers and research institutions After decades of debate on the feasibility of open access (OA) to scientific publications, we may be nearing a tipping point. A number of recent developments, such as Plan S, suggest that OA upon publication could become the default in the sciences within the next several years. Despite uncertainty about the long-term sustainability of OA models, many publishers who had been reluctant to abandon the subscription business model are showing openness to OA (1). Although more OA can mean more immediate, global access to scholarship, there remains a need for practical, sustainable models, for careful analysis of the consequences of business model choices, and for “caution in responding to passionate calls for a ‘default to open’” (2). Of particular concern for the academic community, as subscription revenues decline in the transition to OA and some publishers prioritize other sources of revenue, is the growing ownership of data analytics, hosting, and portal services by large scholarly publishers. This may enhance publishers' ability to lock in institutional customers through combined offerings that condition open access to journals upon purchase of other services. Even if such “bundled” arrangements have a near-term benefit of increasing openly licensed scholarship, they may run counter to long-term interests of the academic community by reducing competition and the diversity of service offerings. The healthy functioning of the academic community, including fair terms and conditions from commercial partners, requires that the global marketplace for data analytics and knowledge infrastructure be kept open to real competition.