PUMA publications for /tag/sharinghttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/tag/sharingPUMA RSS feed for /tag/sharing2024-03-28T20:37:00+01:00Taking the pain out of data sharinghttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/21cc78232a17876bf98467d993e773e1a/diglezakisdiglezakis2022-10-04T08:57:59+02:00forschungsdaten journals motivation sharing <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Matthew Hutson" itemprop="url" href="/person/17184e27a11d6a2a63d29cd840f961344/author/0"><span itemprop="name">M. Hutson</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">Nature</span>, </em> <em><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationVolume" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><span itemprop="volumeNumber">610 </span></span>(<span itemprop="issueNumber">7930</span>):
<span itemprop="pagination">220--221</span></em> </span>(<em><span>Oct 1, 2022<meta content="Oct 1, 2022" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Tue Oct 04 08:57:59 CEST 2022Natureoct7930220--221Taking the pain out of data sharing6102022forschungsdaten journals motivation sharing 01Despite agreeing to make raw data available, some authors fail to comply. The right strategies and platforms can ease the task.Taking the pain out of data sharingTaking the pain out of data sharinghttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/21cc78232a17876bf98467d993e773e1a/forschungsdatenforschungsdaten2022-10-04T08:57:59+02:00forschungsdaten motivation journals sharing from:diglezakis <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Matthew Hutson" itemprop="url" href="/person/17184e27a11d6a2a63d29cd840f961344/author/0"><span itemprop="name">M. Hutson</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">Nature</span>, </em> <em><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationVolume" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><span itemprop="volumeNumber">610 </span></span>(<span itemprop="issueNumber">7930</span>):
<span itemprop="pagination">220--221</span></em> </span>(<em><span>Oct 1, 2022<meta content="Oct 1, 2022" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Tue Oct 04 08:57:59 CEST 2022Natureoct7930220--221Taking the pain out of data sharing6102022forschungsdaten motivation journals sharing from:diglezakis 01Despite agreeing to make raw data available, some authors fail to comply. The right strategies and platforms can ease the task.Taking the pain out of data sharingDataCite as a novel bibliometric source: Coverage, strengths and limitationshttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/22df8bb6d806d52f0a608c931c83e7b41/droesslerdroessler2018-02-20T12:11:00+01:00Bibliometric Data DataCite Open bibliometrie citations data infrastructure metrics metriken sharing sources <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Nicolas Robinson-Garcia" itemprop="url" href="/person/19409ff5574935fd5d6c8b78a3ffcdf7c/author/0"><span itemprop="name">N. Robinson-Garcia</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Philippe Mongeon" itemprop="url" href="/person/19409ff5574935fd5d6c8b78a3ffcdf7c/author/1"><span itemprop="name">P. Mongeon</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Wei Jeng" itemprop="url" href="/person/19409ff5574935fd5d6c8b78a3ffcdf7c/author/2"><span itemprop="name">W. Jeng</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Rodrigo Costas" itemprop="url" href="/person/19409ff5574935fd5d6c8b78a3ffcdf7c/author/3"><span itemprop="name">R. Costas</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">Journal of Informetrics</span>, </em> <em><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationVolume" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><span itemprop="volumeNumber">11 </span></span>(<span itemprop="issueNumber">3</span>):
<span itemprop="pagination">841 - 854</span></em> </span>(<em><span>2017<meta content="2017" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Tue Feb 20 12:11:00 CET 2018Journal of Informetrics3841 - 854DataCite as a novel bibliometric source: Coverage, strengths and limitations112017Bibliometric Data DataCite Open bibliometrie citations data infrastructure metrics metriken sharing sources This paper explores the characteristics of DataCite to determine its possibilities and potential as a new bibliometric data source to analyze the scholarly production of open data. Open science and the increasing data sharing requirements from governments, funding bodies, institutions and scientific journals has led to a pressing demand for the development of data metrics. As a very first step towards reliable data metrics, we need to better comprehend the limitations and caveats of the information provided by sources of open data. In this paper, we critically examine records downloaded from the DataCite’s OAI API and elaborate a series of recommendations regarding the use of this source for bibliometric analyses of open data. We highlight issues related to metadata incompleteness, lack of standardization, and ambiguous definitions of several fields. Despite these limitations, we emphasize DataCite’s value and potential to become one of the main sources for data metrics development.How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Researchhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2970b193e5c2dc8b8c6dbd7614d06c9cb/diglezakisdiglezakis2017-09-12T11:01:57+02:00databases forschungsdaten motivation sharing software <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Nadine Levin" itemprop="url" href="/person/1c1da11ed19223ed9cf11d15d239ca4e8/author/0"><span itemprop="name">N. Levin</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Sabina Leonelli" itemprop="url" href="/person/1c1da11ed19223ed9cf11d15d239ca4e8/author/1"><span itemprop="name">S. Leonelli</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">Science, Technology, & Human Values</span>, </em> <em><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationVolume" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><span itemprop="volumeNumber">42 </span></span>(<span itemprop="issueNumber">2</span>):
<span itemprop="pagination">280-305</span></em> </span>(<em><span>2017<meta content="2017" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Tue Sep 12 11:01:57 CEST 2017Science, Technology, \& Human Values2280-305How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research422017databases forschungsdaten motivation sharing software Open Science policies encourage researchers to disclose a wide range of outputs from their work, thus codifying openness as a specific set of research practices and guidelines that can be interpreted and applied consistently across disciplines and geographical settings. In this paper, we argue that this “one-size-fits-all” view of openness sidesteps key questions about the forms, implications, and goals of openness for research practice. We propose instead to interpret openness as a dynamic and highly situated mode of valuing the research process and its outputs, which encompasses economic as well as scientific, cultural, political, ethical, and social considerations. This interpretation creates a critical space for moving beyond the economic definitions of value embedded in the contemporary biosciences landscape and Open Science policies, and examining the diversity of interests and commitments that affect research practices in the life sciences. To illustrate these claims, we use three case studies that highlight the challenges surrounding decisions about how––and how best––to make things open. These cases, drawn from ethnographic engagement with Open Science debates and semistructured interviews carried out with UK-based biologists and bioinformaticians between 2013 and 2014, show how the enactment of openness reveals judgments about what constitutes a legitimate intellectual contribution, for whom, and with what implications. Position Sharing for Location Privacy in Non-trusted Systemshttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/26f8573d295858dac9ff98b5303969319/skvortsovskvortsov2015-10-19T14:04:13+02:00HLRS location-based management obfuscation privacy service sharing <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Frank Dürr" itemprop="url" href="/person/109cdc544794e017ba8862672c0ebcaeb/author/0"><span itemprop="name">F. Dürr</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Pavel Skvortsov" itemprop="url" href="/person/109cdc544794e017ba8862672c0ebcaeb/author/1"><span itemprop="name">P. Skvortsov</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Kurt Rothermel" itemprop="url" href="/person/109cdc544794e017ba8862672c0ebcaeb/author/2"><span itemprop="name">K. Rothermel</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2011)</span>, </em></span><em>Seattle, USA, </em>(<em><span>March 2011<meta content="March 2011" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Mon Oct 19 14:04:13 CEST 2015Seattle, USAProceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2011)MarchPosition Sharing for Location Privacy in Non-trusted Systems2011HLRS location-based management obfuscation privacy service sharing