PUMA publications for /tag/innovation%20transformationhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/tag/innovation%20transformationPUMA RSS feed for /tag/innovation%20transformation2024-03-29T16:36:28+01:00NIMBY: Konflikte um die Verteilung von Risiken, Gefahren und Kostenhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2b6b5fd28bc53d37d5dcd6a02ebf0ea92/cordula_kroppcordula_kropp2023-11-06T13:51:57+01:00innovation myown sowi5, transformation zirius, <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Helmut Trischler" itemprop="url" href="/person/133c4fbb603d18a75825b336a7887d286/author/0"><span itemprop="name">H. Trischler</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/133c4fbb603d18a75825b336a7887d286/author/1"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information">(<em><span>October 2023<meta content="October 2023" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Mon Nov 06 13:51:57 CET 2023octNIMBY: Konflikte um die Verteilung von Risiken, Gefahren und Kosten2023innovation myown sowi5, transformation zirius, NIMBY – not in my backyard, nicht in meinem Hinterhof – ist ein Akronym aus dem Englischen, mit dem das Phänomen der Ablehnung von Infrastruktureinrichtungen im persönlichen Umfeld beschrieben wird. Im Kontext der Herausbildung neuer sozialer Protestbewegungen gegen technische Infrastrukturen in den USA der 1970er Jahre entstanden, wird der Begriff meist abwertend für Phänomene, Prinzipien und Prozesse verwendet, bei denen gesellschaftliche Gruppierungen aus unterstellten egoistischen Motiven überregional wichtige Infrastrukturen zwar oft auch selbst nutzen wollen, aber gegen deren Errichtung in der Nähe des eigenen Wohnorts protestieren. Für die Technikkommunikation ist NIMBY als Phänomen und (Sankt-Florian-)Prinzip menschlicher Vergemeinschaftung, das potentielle Risiken oder Gefahren nicht löst, sondern durch räumliche Verlagerung oder Einhegung auf andere zu verschieben versucht, von maßgeblicher Relevanz, vor allem, wenn es um den Auf- und Umbau technischer Infrastrukturen geht. In dem Papier zeichnen wir die Geschichte von NIMBY knapp nach und ordnen den NIMBYism in die sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung ein. Wir zeigen auf, in welchen Technikfeldern der NIMBYism primär auftritt und wie die Technikkommunikation ihm produktiv begegnen kann. Denn die normative Aufladung des Begriffs erschwert das Verständnis von gesellschaftlichen Aushandlungsprozessen von technikinduzierten Risiken und Gefahren einerseits, Chancen und Vorteilen andererseits.Sustainable Innovationhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2451730ebd2e496f9c0fa781f65e8254b/cordula_kroppcordula_kropp2023-11-06T13:33:37+01:00innovation myown sowi5, transformation zirius, <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1b956233152123e87e662e03d725c5bda/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">Encyclopedia of Social Innovation</span>, </em><em>chapter 18, </em><em><span itemprop="publisher">Edward Elgar</span>, </em><em>Cheltenham/UK, </em></span>(<em><span>November 2023<meta content="November 2023" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Mon Nov 06 13:33:37 CET 2023Cheltenham/UKEncyclopedia of Social Innovation18nov100-105Sustainable Innovation2023innovation myown sowi5, transformation zirius, Sustainable innovation fuels the hope of safeguarding social, environmental and economic livelihoods worldwide and for future generations through creative inventions and their successful diffusion. Social innovation, in turn, is regarded as a transformative process and social adjustment capable of counteracting poverty and exclusion, the undesirable effects of structural change and one-sided innovation, driven by collaborative organizations whose primary means and ends are social. This paper explores commonalities between the two concepts, potential conflicts of objectives and interactions of social needs vs sustainability criteria.Automatisch nachhaltig? Architektonische Praxis im Zeitalter der Digitalisierunghttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2587bc95146ed947daed9398512bef209/cordula_kroppcordula_kropp2023-10-27T20:16:47+02:00Transformation construction innovation myown sowi5, sustainability zirius, <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1b31b33a1d80d855af06f4e32fbdb466c/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Yana Boeva" itemprop="url" href="/person/1b31b33a1d80d855af06f4e32fbdb466c/author/1"><span itemprop="name">Y. Boeva</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Kathrin Braun" itemprop="url" href="/person/1b31b33a1d80d855af06f4e32fbdb466c/author/2"><span itemprop="name">K. Braun</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">Soziale Probleme</span>, </em> <em><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationVolume" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><span itemprop="volumeNumber">34 </span></span>(<span itemprop="issueNumber">2</span>):
<span itemprop="pagination">238-255</span></em> </span>(<em><span>October 2023<meta content="October 2023" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Fri Oct 27 20:16:47 CEST 2023Soziale Problemeoct2238-255Automatisch nachhaltig? Architektonische Praxis im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung342023Transformation construction innovation myown sowi5, sustainability zirius, Untersuchungen der architektonischen Entwurfspraxis haben gezeigt, dass in der Planung eines Bauprojekts menschliche Planende und technische Werkzeuge interagieren. Heute beeinflussen zwei Herausforderungen diese Interaktion, denen eine wechselseitige Verstärkung zugeschrieben wird: die Digitalisierung und die Notwendigkeit, die gebaute Umwelt nachhaltig zu gestalten. Vor diesem Hintergrund ist das Ziel des Beitrags in einer Fallstudie auszuloten, wie digitale Tools die Entwurfspraktiken verändern und welche Verbindung sie mit Nachhaltigkeitszielen eingehen. Mithilfe einer praxistheoretischen Perspektive, die das „soziodigitale Co-Design“ ins Zentrum rückt, zeigen wir, dass durch digitale Instrumente die notwendige Koordination reorganisiert, aber nicht übernommen wird: „Automatisch“ wird Nachhaltigkeit nicht eingeplant.Between sustainability commitments and anticipated market requirements: Exploring the resilience of the techno-economic innovation paradigm in the midstream of construction researchhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2e57cd1851ad72c60649ccedb3ddce38f/intcdcintcdc2022-06-24T11:17:07+02:00rp18 innovation myown peer sowi5, from:cordula_kropp zirius, transformation <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Deniz Frost" itemprop="url" href="/person/17d0a1ed163d10beca1f0746d272c5088/author/0"><span itemprop="name">D. Frost</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Kathrin Braun" itemprop="url" href="/person/17d0a1ed163d10beca1f0746d272c5088/author/1"><span itemprop="name">K. Braun</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/17d0a1ed163d10beca1f0746d272c5088/author/2"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">NOvation</span>, </em> </span>(<em><span>February 2022<meta content="February 2022" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Fri Jun 24 11:17:07 CEST 2022NOvationfebBetween sustainability commitments and anticipated market requirements: Exploring the resilience of the techno-economic innovation paradigm in the midstream of construction researchII2022rp18 innovation myown peer sowi5, from:cordula_kropp zirius, transformation This article studies ways of dealing with the tension between a commitment to sustainable and responsible research and anticipated market requirements in the midstream of a research process in architecture and construction. Using a slightly modified version of Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR), we explored the chances of questioning the primacy of the techno-economic innovation paradigm by deliberately provoking reflections through STIR interactions. Our research underlines the difficulties and limitations of challenging an orientation towards values of efficiency and productivity in favour of social and environmental values in the midstream of the research process and examines how the techno-economic innovation paradigm is able to insulate itself against critical questioning. It sheds light at the critical role of the underlying assumption that marketability of prospective outcomes is not one objective amongst others but the precondition for all others and at two argumentative patterns we termed the "lack-of-agency" and the "reconciliation-after-all" pattern.Between sustainability commitments and anticipated market requirements: Exploring the resilience of the techno-economic innovation paradigm in the midstream of construction researchhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2e57cd1851ad72c60649ccedb3ddce38f/cordula_kroppcordula_kropp2022-03-08T21:30:37+01:00innovation myown peer rp18 sowi5, transformation zirius, <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Deniz Frost" itemprop="url" href="/person/17d0a1ed163d10beca1f0746d272c5088/author/0"><span itemprop="name">D. Frost</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Kathrin Braun" itemprop="url" href="/person/17d0a1ed163d10beca1f0746d272c5088/author/1"><span itemprop="name">K. Braun</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/17d0a1ed163d10beca1f0746d272c5088/author/2"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">NOvation</span>, </em> </span>(<em><span>February 2022<meta content="February 2022" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Tue Mar 08 21:30:37 CET 2022NOvationfebBetween sustainability commitments and anticipated market requirements: Exploring the resilience of the techno-economic innovation paradigm in the midstream of construction researchII2022innovation myown peer rp18 sowi5, transformation zirius, This article studies ways of dealing with the tension between a commitment to sustainable and responsible research and anticipated market requirements in the midstream of a research process in architecture and construction. Using a slightly modified version of Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR), we explored the chances of questioning the primacy of the techno-economic innovation paradigm by deliberately provoking reflections through STIR interactions. Our research underlines the difficulties and limitations of challenging an orientation towards values of efficiency and productivity in favour of social and environmental values in the midstream of the research process and examines how the techno-economic innovation paradigm is able to insulate itself against critical questioning. It sheds light at the critical role of the underlying assumption that marketability of prospective outcomes is not one objective amongst others but the precondition for all others and at two argumentative patterns we termed the "lack-of-agency" and the "reconciliation-after-all" pattern.Schöne neue Bauwelt? Versprechen, Visionen und Wege des digitalen Planens und Bauenshttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/272be4bbdbb5b4982ccd100bb4a46d43b/cordula_kroppcordula_kropp2021-09-03T10:22:13+02:00digitization innovation myown rp10 sowi5, transformation zirius, <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Kathrin Braun" itemprop="url" href="/person/1c923b3e087d9c191c3398bea9557fcfd/author/0"><span itemprop="name">K. Braun</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1c923b3e087d9c191c3398bea9557fcfd/author/1"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">In digitaler Gesellschaft. Neukonfigurationen zwischen Robotern, Algorithmen und Usern</span>, </em><em><span itemprop="publisher">transcript</span>, </em></span>(<em><span>October 2021<meta content="October 2021" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Fri Sep 03 10:22:13 CEST 2021In digitaler Gesellschaft. Neukonfigurationen zwischen Robotern, Algorithmen und Usernoct135-165Schöne neue Bauwelt? Versprechen, Visionen und Wege des digitalen Planens und Bauens2021digitization innovation myown rp10 sowi5, transformation zirius, Der Beitrag untersucht, wie sich die digitale Transformation im Bauwesen äußert. Ausgehend von den enormen Potenzialen und Herausforderungen sowie der ambivalenten Bewertung der Digitalisierung in der Branche selbst, zeigen die Autorinnen die verschiedenen Formen der Digitalisierung in Architektur, Planungs- und Bauwesen auf und die mit ihnen verbundenen, teils widersprüchlichen Zukunftsvorstellungen. Die Bauwelten der Zukunft, so wird deutlich, sind noch nicht festgelegt und bewegen sich zwischen einer digital und computerbasiert vorangetriebenen Verbesserung der Produktivität, Integration der Wertschöpfungskette, maßgeschneiderten, spektakulären Bauwerken oder nachhaltigeren Bauprozessen. Die Analyse macht deutlich, dass nicht alle vier Leitvorstellungen die gleichen Durchsetzungschancen haben. Da aber digitale Technologien das Bauen der Zukunft fundamental verändern werden, gilt es, sich heute mit den Zielkonflikten zu befassen.Schöne neue Bauwelt? Versprechen, Visionen und Wege des digitalen Planens und Bauenshttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/272be4bbdbb5b4982ccd100bb4a46d43b/intcdcintcdc2021-09-03T10:22:13+02:00innovation myown intcdc from:cordula_kropp rp10 transformation zirius from:kbraun digitization sowi5, zirius, <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Kathrin Braun" itemprop="url" href="/person/1c923b3e087d9c191c3398bea9557fcfd/author/0"><span itemprop="name">K. Braun</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1c923b3e087d9c191c3398bea9557fcfd/author/1"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">In digitaler Gesellschaft. Neukonfigurationen zwischen Robotern, Algorithmen und Usern</span>, </em><em><span itemprop="publisher">transcript</span>, </em></span>(<em><span>October 2021<meta content="October 2021" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Fri Sep 03 10:22:13 CEST 2021In digitaler Gesellschaft. Neukonfigurationen zwischen Robotern, Algorithmen und Usernoct135-165Schöne neue Bauwelt? Versprechen, Visionen und Wege des digitalen Planens und Bauens2021innovation myown intcdc from:cordula_kropp rp10 transformation zirius from:kbraun digitization sowi5, zirius, Wie offen sind offene Innovationsprozesse. Von Nutzerrollen und Umsetzungsbarrierenhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/22c09e525c5dd935604bb049f2221aed3/cordula_kroppcordula_kropp2021-07-16T11:40:37+02:00innovation myown sowi5, transformation zirius, <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="C Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1fe9d3ff0f196c6fc2adaf2a3ea662822/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="G Beck" itemprop="url" href="/person/1fe9d3ff0f196c6fc2adaf2a3ea662822/author/1"><span itemprop="name">G. Beck</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">Wesen und Wege nachhaltigen Konsums. Ergebnisse aus dem Themenschwerpunkt »Vom Wissen zum Handeln - Neue Wege zum nachhaltigen Konsum«</span>, </em><em><span itemprop="publisher">Oekom</span>, </em><em>München, </em></span>(<em><span>2011<meta content="2011" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Fri Jul 16 11:40:37 CEST 2021MünchenWesen und Wege nachhaltigen Konsums. Ergebnisse aus dem Themenschwerpunkt »Vom Wissen zum Handeln - Neue Wege zum nachhaltigen Konsum«335-349Wie offen sind offene Innovationsprozesse. Von Nutzerrollen und Umsetzungsbarrieren2011innovation myown sowi5, transformation zirius, La transformation durable par l’innovation sociale dans les Alpeshttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2df63c25fffcd391d3c951f9a193a0d65/cordula_kroppcordula_kropp2021-04-15T10:30:00+02:00climate innovation myown social sowi5, transformation zirius, <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1623d866eb7c2386dcbb57c79feef5018/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">La Transformation sociale par l’innovation sociale</span>, </em><em><span itemprop="publisher">Presses de l’Université du Québec</span>, </em><em>Montréal, </em></span>(<em><span>2016<meta content="2016" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Thu Apr 15 10:30:00 CEST 2021MontréalLa Transformation sociale par l’innovation sociale207-2020La transformation durable par l’innovation sociale dans les AlpesPublication2016climate innovation myown social sowi5, transformation zirius, Forschung zu sozialen Innovationen am Scheideweghttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2dbedbdff9f089d48a605df2a5cad51a3/cordula_kroppcordula_kropp2021-04-15T10:25:40+02:00innovation myown social sowi5, transformation zirius, <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1b0a6d1594c247d45b06d994540b59d59/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">GAIA</span>, </em> <em><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationVolume" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><span itemprop="volumeNumber">26 </span></span>(<span itemprop="issueNumber">4</span>):
<span itemprop="pagination">309-312</span></em> </span>(<em><span>2017<meta content="2017" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Thu Apr 15 10:25:40 CEST 2021GAIA4309-312Forschung zu sozialen Innovationen am Scheideweg262017innovation myown social sowi5, transformation zirius, Embedded Humanism: Chancen und Risiken von STIR für eine transformative TA.https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2d04156fe6a8d90fe7ef247356478acc7/cordula_kroppcordula_kropp2021-04-15T09:56:36+02:00STIR TA innovation myown responsibility rp18 transformation <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1c0fd1d86363abdd7dd251b82d7ba479b/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">Gesellschaftliche Transformation: Gegenstand oder Aufgabe der Technikfolgenabschätzung.</span>, </em><em>volume 22 of Gesellschaft – Technik – Umwelt, </em><em><span itemprop="publisher">Nomos</span>, </em><em>Baden-Baden, </em></span>(<em><span>2021<meta content="2021" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Thu Apr 15 09:56:36 CEST 2021Baden-BadenGesellschaftliche Transformation: Gegenstand oder Aufgabe der Technikfolgenabschätzung.119-131Gesellschaft – Technik – UmweltEmbedded Humanism: Chancen und Risiken von STIR für eine transformative TA.Publication222021STIR TA innovation myown responsibility rp18 transformation Grassroots initiatives in food system transformation: the role of food movements in the second ‘Great Transformation’https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/22e999ac36aadf84a8a7167ff9e9e258a/cordula_kroppcordula_kropp2021-04-15T09:52:00+02:00Food Innovation Movements Transformation myown <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Colin Sage" itemprop="url" href="/person/188bec8f63fda80b917c2b84b9409b7a4/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Sage</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/188bec8f63fda80b917c2b84b9409b7a4/author/1"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Irene Antoni-Komar" itemprop="url" href="/person/188bec8f63fda80b917c2b84b9409b7a4/author/2"><span itemprop="name">I. Antoni-Komar</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">Food System Transformations: Social Movements, local economies, collaborative networks (Critical Food Studies)</span>, </em><em>chapter 1., </em><em><span itemprop="publisher">Routledge</span>, </em><em>New York/ London, </em></span>(<em><span>2021<meta content="2021" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Thu Apr 15 09:52:00 CEST 2021New York/ LondonFood System Transformations: Social Movements, local economies, collaborative networks (Critical Food Studies)1.1-19Grassroots initiatives in food system transformation: the role of food movements in the second ‘Great Transformation’2021Food Innovation Movements Transformation myown Digital innovation in incumbent firms: an exploratory analysis of value creationhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/20490451cd55eb4cf5c29aa4d330bdfc9/michaboslermichabosler2020-10-28T08:39:05+01:00Digital Innovation Innovationmanagement Transformation <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Micha Bosler" itemprop="url" href="/person/1d68a4e4596b3ec460b279c9b41c95c37/author/0"><span itemprop="name">M. Bosler</span></a></span>, </span><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Wolfgang Burr" itemprop="url" href="/person/1d68a4e4596b3ec460b279c9b41c95c37/author/1"><span itemprop="name">W. Burr</span></a></span>, </span> and <span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="L. Ihring" itemprop="url" href="/person/1d68a4e4596b3ec460b279c9b41c95c37/author/2"><span itemprop="name">L. Ihring</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/PublicationIssue" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="journal">International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management</span>, </em> </span>(<em><span>June 2020<meta content="June 2020" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Wed Oct 28 08:39:05 CET 2020International Journal of Innovation and Technology ManagementjunDigital innovation in incumbent firms: an exploratory analysis of value creationOnline Ready2020Digital Innovation Innovationmanagement Transformation Incumbent firms’ competitiveness largely depends on the ability to develop digital innovation as novel combination of digital and physical components. This paper provides a better understanding of value creation through digital innovation, focussing on market offerings from incumbent firms. Based on the insights of an exploratory multiple case study with seven cases from the automotive, machine engineering, and consumer goods industries in Germany, we explain the multi-sided changes required for the development and management of digital innovations. Afterwards, we contribute to the further theorization of digital innovation. According to our empirical findings, we decided to discuss the applicability of the resource-based and competence-based approach.Sustainability Transformation through Social Innovation in the Shadow of Hierarchyhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/24aa5b7af284b1f1561df800f427eaaf7/sowi5sowi52019-06-30T17:32:12+02:00innovation Sowi5CK social hierarchy from:alisauhrig shadow sustainability transformation <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1673effa82246982f00754cc9c543aa92/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">La transformation Sociale par l’Innovation Sociale. Conference Proceedings</span>, </em></span>(<em><span>2014<meta content="2014" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Sun Jun 30 17:32:12 CEST 2019La transformation Sociale par l’Innovation Sociale. Conference Proceedings428-443Sustainability Transformation through Social Innovation in the Shadow of Hierarchy2014innovation Sowi5CK social hierarchy from:alisauhrig shadow sustainability transformation The paper compares results from in-depth-investigations of local sustainable development processes in European Alpine communities (Austria, Italy and Germany), in which step-by-step social transformation to react on global warming has been developed in a context of collective learning processes (resp. experimentation) and corresponding social innovation. The focus on involved actor constellations and the role of guiding visions (cf. Späth/ Rohracher 2010) helps to identify a) the role of social innovation as a governance process and as a governance structure and b) the scope of intended change, ranging from niche actions to community-based social innovation (cf. Martinelli 2010). Thereby, a critical review will be given to the dark side of bottom-up social innovations “mediated by power” (Swyngedouw 2005: 1998) and their interconnection to dominant framings and existing power relations. This leads, finally, to consider in more detail the operational capacity of local actor coalition...Sustainability Transformation through Social Innovation in the Shadow of Hierarchyhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2822179474ad730dbce74a059e27206ae/sowi5sowi52019-06-30T17:28:35+02:00innovation Sowi5CK social hierarchy from:alisauhrig shadow sustainability transformation <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1673effa82246982f00754cc9c543aa92/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">La transformation Sociale par l’Innovation Sociale. Conference Proceedings</span>, </em></span><em>page <span itemprop="pagination">428-443</span>. </em><em>Center for research on social innovations – CRISES, </em>(<em><span>2014<meta content="2014" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Sun Jun 30 17:28:35 CEST 2019La transformation Sociale par l’Innovation Sociale. Conference Proceedings428-443Sustainability Transformation through Social Innovation in the Shadow of Hierarchy2014innovation Sowi5CK social hierarchy from:alisauhrig shadow sustainability transformation The paper compares results from in-depth-investigations of local sustainable development processes in European Alpine communities (Austria, Italy and Germany), in which step-by-step social transformation to react on global warming has been developed in a context of collective learning processes (resp. experimentation) and corresponding social innovation. The focus on involved actor constellations and the role of guiding visions (cf. Späth/ Rohracher 2010) helps to identify a) the role of social innovation as a governance process and as a governance structure and b) the scope of intended change, ranging from niche actions to community-based social innovation (cf. Martinelli 2010). Thereby, a critical review will be given to the dark side of bottom-up social innovations “mediated by power” (Swyngedouw 2005: 1998) and their interconnection to dominant framings and existing power relations. This leads, finally, to consider in more detail the operational capacity of local actor coalition...Sustainability Transformation through Social Innovation in the Shadow of Hierarchyhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/24aa5b7af284b1f1561df800f427eaaf7/alisauhrigalisauhrig2019-06-28T16:18:15+02:00Sowi5CK hierarchy innovation shadow social sustainability transformation <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="Cordula Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1673effa82246982f00754cc9c543aa92/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">La transformation Sociale par l’Innovation Sociale. Conference Proceedings</span>, </em></span>(<em><span>2014<meta content="2014" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Fri Jun 28 16:18:15 CEST 2019La transformation Sociale par l’Innovation Sociale. Conference Proceedings428-443Sustainability Transformation through Social Innovation in the Shadow of Hierarchy2014Sowi5CK hierarchy innovation shadow social sustainability transformation The paper compares results from in-depth-investigations of local sustainable development processes in European Alpine communities (Austria, Italy and Germany), in which step-by-step social transformation to react on global warming has been developed in a context of collective learning processes (resp. experimentation) and corresponding social innovation. The focus on involved actor constellations and the role of guiding visions (cf. Späth/ Rohracher 2010) helps to identify a) the role of social innovation as a governance process and as a governance structure and b) the scope of intended change, ranging from niche actions to community-based social innovation (cf. Martinelli 2010). Thereby, a critical review will be given to the dark side of bottom-up social innovations “mediated by power” (Swyngedouw 2005: 1998) and their interconnection to dominant framings and existing power relations. This leads, finally, to consider in more detail the operational capacity of local actor coalition...Sustainability Transformation through Social Innovation in the Shadow of Hierarchyhttps://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/2f5920f79a9d679b95b17968f4640d34a/sowi5sowi52019-06-28T16:18:15+02:00innovation social hierarchy from:alisauhrig sowi5CK shadow sustainability transformation <span data-person-type="author" class="authorEditorList "><span><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="author"><a title="C Kropp" itemprop="url" href="/person/1673effa82246982f00754cc9c543aa92/author/0"><span itemprop="name">C. Kropp</span></a></span></span>. </span><span class="additional-entrytype-information"><span itemtype="http://schema.org/Book" itemscope="itemscope" itemprop="isPartOf"><em><span itemprop="name">La transformation Sociale par l’Innovation Sociale. Conference Proceedings</span>, </em></span><em>page <span itemprop="pagination">428-443</span>. </em><em>Center for research on social innovations – CRISES, </em>(<em><span>2014<meta content="2014" itemprop="datePublished"/></span></em>)</span>Fri Jun 28 16:18:15 CEST 2019La transformation Sociale par l’Innovation Sociale. Conference Proceedings428-443Sustainability Transformation through Social Innovation in the Shadow of Hierarchy2014innovation social hierarchy from:alisauhrig sowi5CK shadow sustainability transformation The paper compares results from in-depth-investigations of local sustainable development processes in European Alpine communities (Austria, Italy and Germany), in which step-by-step social transformation to react on global warming has been developed in a context of collective learning processes (resp. experimentation) and corresponding social innovation. The focus on involved actor constellations and the role of guiding visions (cf. Späth/ Rohracher 2010) helps to identify a) the role of social innovation as a governance process and as a governance structure and b) the scope of intended change, ranging from niche actions to community-based social innovation (cf. Martinelli 2010). Thereby, a critical review will be given to the dark side of bottom-up social innovations “mediated by power” (Swyngedouw 2005: 1998) and their interconnection to dominant framings and existing power relations. This leads, finally, to consider in more detail the operational capacity of local actor coalition...