%0 Generic %1 hitz2022comparison %A Hitz, Timon %A Jöns, Steven %A Heinen, Matthias %A Vrabec, Jadran %A Munz, Claus-Dieter %D 2022 %K %R 10.18419/darus-2539 %T Data from: Comparison of Macro- and Microscopic Solutions of the Riemann Problem II. Two-Phase Shock Tube %X This dataset refers to the results of a compressible sharp-interface code published in: Hitz et al. 2021 (Comparison of macro- and microscopic solutions of the Riemann problem II. Two-phase shock tube). Therein, three shock tube-like scenarios were considered in which the initial states were a liquid and a vapor of the Lennard-Jones truncated and shifted fluid. The initial states were not in equilibrium. Consequently, evaporation occurred during runtime. The numerical method modeled evaporation via the use of a two-phase Riemann solver with appropriate closure conditions for the heat and mass flux at the interface. The solution on the bulk phases was obtained via a discontinuous Galerkin method with finite volume sub-cell shock-capturing. As Equation of state, a Fortran implementation of the PeTS EOS was used (see: Hitz & Munz 2021 "Fortran Implementation of Perturbed Truncated and Shifted Model Fluid (PeTS) EOS"). Each of the data files refers to the three cases discussed in the publication. All Data is given as non-dimensional quantities as discussed in Hitz et al. 2021 (Comparison of macro- and microscopic solutions of the Riemann problem II. Two-phase shock tube).

@misc{hitz2022comparison, abstract = {This dataset refers to the results of a compressible sharp-interface code published in: Hitz et al. 2021 (Comparison of macro- and microscopic solutions of the Riemann problem II. Two-phase shock tube). Therein, three shock tube-like scenarios were considered in which the initial states were a liquid and a vapor of the Lennard-Jones truncated and shifted fluid. The initial states were not in equilibrium. Consequently, evaporation occurred during runtime. The numerical method modeled evaporation via the use of a two-phase Riemann solver with appropriate closure conditions for the heat and mass flux at the interface. The solution on the bulk phases was obtained via a discontinuous Galerkin method with finite volume sub-cell shock-capturing. As Equation of state, a Fortran implementation of the PeTS EOS was used (see: Hitz & Munz 2021 "Fortran Implementation of Perturbed Truncated and Shifted Model Fluid (PeTS) EOS"). Each of the data files refers to the three cases discussed in the publication. All Data is given as non-dimensional quantities as discussed in Hitz et al. 2021 (Comparison of macro- and microscopic solutions of the Riemann problem II. Two-phase shock tube).}, added-at = {2023-08-31T16:51:27.000+0200}, affiliation = {Hitz, Timon/Universität Stuttgart, Jöns, Steven/Universität Stuttgart, Heinen, Matthias/Technische Universität Berlin, Vrabec, Jadran/Technische Universität Berlin, Munz, Claus-Dieter/Universität Stuttgart}, author = {Hitz, Timon and Jöns, Steven and Heinen, Matthias and Vrabec, Jadran and Munz, Claus-Dieter}, biburl = {https://puma.ub.uni-stuttgart.de/bibtex/26b42acd7f5006f52a13fdfa0d8b603af/puma-wartung}, doi = {10.18419/darus-2539}, howpublished = {Dataset}, interhash = {9f2bbae632073af034f27231e193b7dc}, intrahash = {6b42acd7f5006f52a13fdfa0d8b603af}, keywords = {}, note = {Related to: Timon Hitz, Steven Jöns, Matthias Heinen, Jadran Vrabec, Claus-Dieter Munz,"Comparison of macro- and microscopic solutions of the Riemann problem II. Two-phase shock tube", Journal of Computational Physics 429 (2021), 110027. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110027}, orcid-numbers = {Hitz, Timon/0000-0002-6501-9728, Jöns, Steven/0000-0002-6545-6776, Heinen, Matthias/0000-0002-2222-1790, Vrabec, Jadran/0000-0002-7947-4051}, timestamp = {2023-08-31T14:51:27.000+0200}, title = {Data from: Comparison of Macro- and Microscopic Solutions of the Riemann Problem II. Two-Phase Shock Tube}, year = 2022 }